IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i5p1549-d326237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Dog Walking on Gait and Mobility in People with Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Suzanne O’Neal

    (Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA)

  • Megan Eikenberry

    (Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA)

  • Byron Russell

    (Physical Therapy Program, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ 85308, USA)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of dog walking on gait and mobility in people with Parkinson disease (PD). This single-group, single-session, observational pilot study included nineteen participants with PD in Hoehn and Yahr stages II ( n = 9) and III ( n = 10). Primary measures were a gait analysis and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). Three trials of two conditions (walking with and without a dog) were completed. Walking with a dog resulted in slower gait velocity (mean difference = 0.11 m/s, p = 0.003, d = 0.77), shorter step length (left: mean difference = 7.11 cm, p = 0.000; right: mean difference = 3.05, p = 0.01), and stride length (left: mean difference = 7.52, p = 0.003; right: mean difference = 8.74, p = 0.001). The base of support was more narrowed (Z = −2.13, p = 0.03), with increased double limb stance time (left: Z = −2.89, p = 0.004; right: Z = −2.59, p = 0.01). Walking with a dog caused slower TUG times (mean difference = −1.67, p = 0.000) and increased number of steps (Z = −3.73, p = 0.000). No significant change shown in step time (left: mean difference = −0.001, p = 0.81; right: mean difference = 0.002, p = 0.77) or cadence (Z = −1.67, p = 0.10). In conclusion, there was an overall decline of gait parameters in people with PD when walking with a dog.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzanne O’Neal & Megan Eikenberry & Byron Russell, 2020. "The Effects of Dog Walking on Gait and Mobility in People with Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1549-:d:326237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/5/1549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:5:p:1549-:d:326237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.