IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1348-d322624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards the Use of Standardized Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Helm

    (Research Department Advanced Information Systems and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria
    Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing, Johannes Kepler University, 4040 Linz, Austria)

  • Anna M. Lin

    (Research Department Advanced Information Systems and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria)

  • David Baumgartner

    (Research Department Advanced Information Systems and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria)

  • Alvin C. Lin

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada)

  • Josef Küng

    (Institute for Applied Knowledge Processing, Johannes Kepler University, 4040 Linz, Austria)

Abstract

Process mining can provide greater insight into medical treatment processes and organizational processes in healthcare. To enhance comparability between processes, the quality of the labelled-data is essential. A literature review of the clinical case studies by Rojas et al. in 2016 identified several common aspects for comparison, which include methodologies, algorithms or techniques, medical fields, and healthcare specialty. However, clinical aspects are not reported in a uniform way and do not follow a standard clinical coding scheme. Further, technical aspects such as details of the event log data are not always described. In this paper, we identified 38 clinically-relevant case studies of process mining in healthcare published from 2016 to 2018 that described the tools, algorithms and techniques utilized, and details on the event log data. We then correlated the clinical aspects of patient encounter environment, clinical specialty and medical diagnoses using the standard clinical coding schemes SNOMED CT and ICD-10. The potential outcomes of adopting a standard approach for describing event log data and classifying medical terminology using standard clinical coding schemes are further discussed. A checklist template for the reporting of case studies is provided in the Appendix A to the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Helm & Anna M. Lin & David Baumgartner & Alvin C. Lin & Josef Küng, 2020. "Towards the Use of Standardized Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Process Mining in Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1348-:d:322624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyunyoung Baek & Minsu Cho & Seok Kim & Hee Hwang & Minseok Song & Sooyoung Yoo, 2018. "Analysis of length of hospital stay using electronic health records: A statistical and data mining approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Christoph Rinner & Emmanuel Helm & Reinhold Dunkl & Harald Kittler & Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, 2018. "Process Mining and Conformance Checking of Long Running Processes in the Context of Melanoma Surveillance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dylan A. Mordaunt, 2020. "On Clinical Utility and Systematic Reporting in Case Studies of Healthcare Process Mining. Comment on: 10.3390/ijerph17041348 “Towards the Use of Standardised Terms in Clinical Case Studies for Proces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-4, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lia Gentil & Guy Grenier & Helen-Maria Vasiliadis & Marie-Josée Fleury, 2022. "Predictors of Length of Hospitalization and Impact on Early Readmission for Mental Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Kuluski, Kerry & Cadel, Lauren & Marcinow, Michelle & Sandercock, Jane & Guilcher, Sara JT, 2022. "Expanding our understanding of factors impacting delayed hospital discharge: Insights from patients, caregivers, providers and organizational leaders in Ontario, Canada," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(4), pages 310-317.
    3. Addisu Jember Zeleke & Serena Moscato & Rossella Miglio & Lorenzo Chiari, 2022. "Length of Stay Analysis of COVID-19 Hospitalizations Using a Count Regression Model and Quantile Regression: A Study in Bologna, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Martin Kopecky & Hana Tomaskova, 2020. "The Business Process Model and Notation Used for the Representation of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Care Process," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Anthony Gramaje & Fadi Thabtah & Neda Abdelhamid & Sayan Kumar Ray, 2021. "Patient Discharge Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 755-767, December.
    6. Davide Golinelli & Francesco Sanmarchi & Fabrizio Toscano & Andrea Bucci & Nicola Nante, 2024. "Analyzing the 20-year declining trend of hospital length-of-stay in European countries with different healthcare systems and reimbursement models," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 375-392, September.
    7. Braulio A Marfil-Garza & Pablo F Belaunzarán-Zamudio & Alfonso Gulias-Herrero & Antonio Camiro Zuñiga & Yanink Caro-Vega & David Kershenobich-Stalnikowitz & José Sifuentes-Osornio, 2018. "Risk factors associated with prolonged hospital length-of-stay: 18-year retrospective study of hospitalizations in a tertiary healthcare center in Mexico," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Reyes-Santias, Francisco & Reboredo, Juan C. & de Assis, Edilson Machado & Rivera-Castro, Miguel A., 2021. "Does length of hospital stay reflect power-law behavior? A q-Weibull density approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).
    9. Rita Matos & Diogo Ferreira & Maria Isabel Pedro, 2021. "Economic Analysis of Portuguese Public Hospitals Through the Construction of Quality, Efficiency, Access, and Financial Related Composite Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 361-392, August.
    10. Minsu Cho & Minseok Song & Junhyun Park & Seok-Ran Yeom & Il-Jae Wang & Byung-Kwan Choi, 2020. "Process Mining-Supported Emergency Room Process Performance Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1348-:d:322624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.