IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1339-d322464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Li

    (East China Sea Institute/Center for Ecological Civilization of Yangtze River Delta, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
    Fashion Department of International United Faculty between Ningbo University and University of Angers/Faculty of Tourism and Culture, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315201, China)

  • Yi Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Qing He

    (Fashion Institute/Silk and Fashion Culture Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Yongliang Yang

    (School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Ecological Civilization Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

Carbon footprint refers to the greenhouse gas emissions of an activity during the whole life cycle or a specific period of time. Mulberry is an important cash crop. Thus, establishing a standardized accounting method for the carbon footprint of mulberry production and analyzing its carbon emission scenarios is important in correctly understanding the impact of mulberry production on the environment. Using the life cycle assessment method and on the basis of the statistical data of mulberry production of urban farmers in Haining City, China, in 2014–2016, this study calculates and evaluates the carbon footprint of mulberry production. Results show the following. (1) Indirect carbon emissions is the main part of total carbon emissions, accounting for 85%–88% of total carbon emission, and industrial inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) are the main cause of carbon emissions. (2) The total carbon emissions per hectare in 2016 (6550.73 kgce/hm 2 ) rose relative to the 2015 data (5617.92 kgce/hm 2 at least in 2014) (5729.64 kgce/hm 2 ). The output value of mulberry in spring was greater than that in summer and autumn, and the production efficiency of mulberry carbon in spring was higher than that in summer and autumn. The ecological environment of the mulberry production industry can be improved by increasing the resources of carbon sequestration and reducing the source of production input. (3) In general, the photosynthetic carbon sink of mulberry is greater than the total carbon emission and presents a positive externality to the ecological environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Li & Yi Wang & Qing He & Yongliang Yang, 2020. "Calculation and Evaluation of Carbon Footprint in Mulberry Production: A Case of Haining in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1339-:d:322464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1339/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1339/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McLaughlin, Hope & Littlefield, Anna A. & Menefee, Maia & Kinzer, Austin & Hull, Tobias & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan D. & Kim, Jinsoo & Griffiths, Steven, 2023. "Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: Sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    2. Ruyida Mushtaq & Rajesh Kumar Yadav & Abida Fayaz Fayaz & Pervez Ahmed & Harmeet Singh, 2024. "Multi-criteria land suitability assessment for mulberry-based agroforestry using AHP and GIS approach in Anantnag district of the Kashmir valley, India, to achieve sustainable agriculture," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28293-28315, November.
    3. Víctor Cloquell Ballester & Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira & Miguel Ángel Artacho-Ramírez & Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo, 2020. "The Carbon Footprint of Valencia Port: A Case Study of the Port Authority of Valencia (Spain)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1339-:d:322464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.