IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1214-d320375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cost and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) Intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Fehmidah Munir

    (School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Paul Miller

    (Miller Economics Ltd., Biohub Alderley Park, Alderley Edge SK10 4TG, UK)

  • Stuart J.H. Biddle

    (Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Education City, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia)

  • Melanie J. Davies

    (Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
    NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
    Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)

  • David W. Dunstan

    (Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
    Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, The Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Dale W. Esliger

    (School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Laura J. Gray

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK)

  • Sophie E. O’Connell

    (Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)

  • Ghazala Waheed

    (Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)

  • Thomas Yates

    (Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
    NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)

  • Charlotte L. Edwardson

    (Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
    NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
    Joint first author.)

Abstract

This study conducted a cost and cost-benefit analysis of the Stand More AT (SMArT) Work workplace intervention, designed to reduce sitting time. The study was a cluster two-armed randomised controlled trial involving 37 office clusters (146 desk-based workers) in a National Health Service Trust. The intervention group received a height-adjustable workstation with supporting behaviour change strategies. The control group continued with usual practice. Self-report absenteeism, presenteeism and work productivity were assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months; and organisational sickness absence records 12 months prior to, and 12 months of the intervention. Mean per employee costs associated with SMArT Work were calculated. Absenteeism, presenteeism and work productivity were estimated, and employer-recorded absence data and employee wage-banding were used to provide a human-capital-based estimate of costs to the organisation. The return-on-investment (ROI) and incremental cost-efficacy ratios (ICER) were calculated. Intervention cost was £692.40 per employee. Cost-benefit estimates show a net saving of £1770.32 (95%CI £-354.40, £3895.04) per employee as a result of productivity increase. There were no significant differences in absence data compared to the control group. SMArT Work provides supporting evidence for policy-makers and employers on the cost benefits of reducing sitting time at work.

Suggested Citation

  • Fehmidah Munir & Paul Miller & Stuart J.H. Biddle & Melanie J. Davies & David W. Dunstan & Dale W. Esliger & Laura J. Gray & Sophie E. O’Connell & Ghazala Waheed & Thomas Yates & Charlotte L. Edwardso, 2020. "A Cost and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1214-:d:320375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lan Gao & Phuong Nguyen & David Dunstan & Marjory Moodie, 2019. "Are Office-Based Workplace Interventions Designed to Reduce Sitting Time Cost-Effective Primary Prevention Measures for Cardiovascular Disease? A Systematic Review and Modelled Economic Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bradley MacDonald & Ann-Marie Gibson & Xanne Janssen & Jasmin Hutchinson & Samuel Headley & Tracey Matthews & Alison Kirk, 2019. "Should We Scale-Up? A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of an Intervention Targeting Sedentary Office Workers Using the RE-AIM QuEST Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Edward Cox & Simon Walker & Charlotte L. Edwardson & Stuart J. H. Biddle & Alexandra M. Clarke-Cornwell & Stacy A. Clemes & Melanie J. Davies & David W. Dunstan & Helen Eborall & Malcolm H. Granat & L, 2022. "The Cost-Effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life Intervention for Reducing Sitting Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1214-:d:320375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.