IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i3p886-d314755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content and Delivery of Physical Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis across Europe: A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Řasová

    (Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 108 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jenny Freeman

    (Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Devon PL6 8BH, UK)

  • Davide Cattaneo

    (IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Larice Lab, P20148 Milan, Italy)

  • Johanna Jonsdottir

    (IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Larice Lab, P20148 Milan, Italy)

  • Ilse Baert

    (Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center REVAL, BIOMED, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Tori Smedal

    (Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Department of Neurology, and Department of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway)

  • Anders Romberg

    (Physiotherapy, Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Centre, 21250 Masku, Finland)

  • Peter Feys

    (Campus Diepenbeek, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, REVAL Rehabilitation Research center REVAL, BIOMED, Hasselt University, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Jose Alves-Guerreiro

    (School of Health Sciences, Health Research Unit, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Campus 2-Morro do Lena-Alto do Vieiro, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Mario Habek

    (Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System, University Hospital Center Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Kispaticeva, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Thomas Henze

    (Specialist Practice in Neurology, 93059 Regensburg, Germany)

  • Carme Santoyo-Medina

    (Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department & Neurorehabilitation Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Antonie Beiske

    (Nevrologgruppen Oslo, 0159 Oslo, Norway)

  • Paul Van Asch

    (Fit Up, Fitness- and Physiotherapy Center, 2550 Kontich, Belgium)

  • Daphne Bakalidou

    (Department of physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Egaleo, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Yeliz Salcı

    (Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey)

  • Erieta Dimitrova

    (Department for Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia)

  • Markéta Pavlíková

    (Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská 87, 108 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Ivana Štětkářová

    (Department of Neurology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 100 34 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jana Vorlíčková

    (Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences,18207 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Patricia Martinková

    (Department of Statistical Modelling, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences,18207 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Background: Guidelines and general recommendations are available for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation, but no specific guidance exists for physical therapists. Describing aspects of physical therapy content and delivery in multiple sclerosis and its determinants and analysing whether general recommendations connected with physical therapy are implemented in practice is important for interpreting clinical and research evidence. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of physical therapists specialized in multiple sclerosis (212 specialists from 26 European countries) was used. Results : There was distinct diversity in service delivery and content across Europe. Perceived accessibility of physical therapy varied from most accessible in the Western region, and least in the Southern region. Sixty-four physical therapists adjusted their approach according to different disability levels, less so in the Eastern region. Duration, frequency and dose of sessions differed between regions, being highest in Southern and Western regions. “Hands on treatment” was the most commonly used therapeutic approach in all apart from the Northern regions, where “word instruction” (providing advice and information) prevailed. Conclusions: The content and delivery of physical therapy differs across Europe. Recommendations concerning access to treatment and adjustment according to disability do not appear to be widely implemented in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Řasová & Jenny Freeman & Davide Cattaneo & Johanna Jonsdottir & Ilse Baert & Tori Smedal & Anders Romberg & Peter Feys & Jose Alves-Guerreiro & Mario Habek & Thomas Henze & Carme Santoyo-Medina, 2020. "Content and Delivery of Physical Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis across Europe: A Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:886-:d:314755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/886/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/3/886/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamila Řasová & Patrícia Martinková & Bernadita Soler & Jenny Freeman & Davide Cattaneo & Johanna Jonsdottir & Tori Smedal & Anders Romberg & Thomas Henze & Carme Santoyo-Medina & Peter Feys, 2020. "Real-World Goal Setting and Use of Outcome Measures According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A European Survey of Physical Therapy Practice in Multiple Scle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:3:p:886-:d:314755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.