Author
Listed:
- Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez
(Faculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)
- Daniela Alejandra Loaiza-Martínez
(Faculty of Sports, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain)
- Javier Sánchez-Sánchez
(School of Sport and Science, European University of Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
IGOID Research Group, University of Castilla de la Mancha, 13071 Castilla la Mancha, Spain)
- Pablo J. Marcos-Pardo
(Faculty of Sports, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain)
- Soledad Prats
(Faculty of Sciences, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)
- Fernando Alacid
(Department of Education, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)
- Jacobo A. Rubio-Arias
(LFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is an immunological disorder that mainly affects the small intestine, generating an inflammatory process in response to the presence of gluten (a protein). Autoimmune diseases are part of a group of diseases that are difficult to diagnose without a specific protocol or consensus to detect them due to the number of symptoms and diseases with which it has a relationship. Therefore, the aim of this review was to analyze the diagnostic tools of CD used in middle-aged women, to compare the use and effectiveness of the different tools, and to propose a strategy for the use of the tools based on the results found in the literature. The present research followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search was conducted in the following databases: Scielo, PubMed, Web of Science, and Worldwide Science org. In the initial literature search, 2004 titles and relevant abstracts were found. Among them, 687 were duplicates, leaving 1130 articles. Based on the inclusion criteria, only 41 articles passed the selection process; 4 main types of analyses appear in the studies: blood tests, questionnaires, clinical history, and biopsy. It can be said that none of the analyses have a 100% reliability since most of them can present false negatives; therefore, the best way to diagnose celiac disease up to now is through a combination of different tests (Immunoglobulin A and small intestinal biopsy).
Suggested Citation
Alejandro Martínez-Rodríguez & Daniela Alejandra Loaiza-Martínez & Javier Sánchez-Sánchez & Pablo J. Marcos-Pardo & Soledad Prats & Fernando Alacid & Jacobo A. Rubio-Arias, 2020.
"Tools Used to Measure the Physical State of Women with Celiac Disease: A Review with a Systematic Approach,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:539-:d:308789
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:539-:d:308789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.