IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i2p504-d308319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconventional Natural Gas Exposure Metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan J. Buonocore

    (Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Joan A. Casey

    (Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • Rachel Croy

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • John D. Spengler

    (Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Lisa McKenzie

    (Environmental and Occupational Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA)

Abstract

In their study “Assessing Agreement in Exposure Classification between Proximity-Based Metrics and Air Monitoring Data in Epidemiology Studies of Unconventional Resource Development” Hess et al [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan J. Buonocore & Joan A. Casey & Rachel Croy & John D. Spengler & Lisa McKenzie, 2020. "Air Monitoring Stations Far Removed From Drilling Activities Do Not Represent Residential Exposures to Marcellus Shale Air Pollutants. Response to the Paper by Hess et al. on Proximity-Based Unconvent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-5, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:504-:d:308319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/2/504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judy Wendt Hess & Gerald Bachler & Fayaz Momin & Krystal Sexton, 2020. "Reply to Schade G. Comment on Hess et al. “Assessing Agreement in Exposure Classifications between Proximity-Based Metrics and Air Monitoring Data in Epidemiology Studies of Unconventional Resource De," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-3, August.
    2. Gunnar W. Schade, 2020. "Critique of Well Activity Proxy Uses Inadequate Data and Statistics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-4, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    n/a;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:504-:d:308319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.