Author
Listed:
- John Okogbaa
(Division of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, Xavier University of Louisiana College of Pharmacy, New Orleans, LA 70125, USA)
- Rondall E. Allen
(Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Maryland Eastern Shore School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA)
- Daniel F. Sarpong
(Division of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, Xavier University of Louisiana College of Pharmacy, New Orleans, LA 70125, USA)
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of time spent at work (workload) on the academic performance of pharmacy students. A cross-sectional 12-item survey was administered to pharmacy students at the end of the spring 2011 semester to primarily assess the type of employment and their weekly workload during the 2010–2011 academic year. Academic performance was determined by semester and cumulative grade point average (GPA). Descriptive statistics were performed. Stratified multiple linear regression models were obtained to assess the association between students’ workload and GPA. Analysis of covariance was used to compare academic performance by workload after accounting for work type and potential covariates. Statistical significance was defined a priori as p < 0.05. For both fall and spring semesters, nonpharmacy-related work was significant and positively associated with GPA. Both semester GPAs were fairly similar among three student classifications (P1–P3). However, GPAs across both semesters varied by classification. The negative association of workload on GPA was significant in the fall but not in the spring semester. Although workload matters, future studies using a mixed-method approach might help explain the role of workload on the academic performance of pharmacy during the first three years of their professional training.
Suggested Citation
John Okogbaa & Rondall E. Allen & Daniel F. Sarpong, 2020.
"Time Spent at Work and Its Impact on the Academic Performance of Pharmacy Students,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:496-:d:308172
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:496-:d:308172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.