IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i24p9259-d460237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional Analysis of the Spine with the Idiag SpinalMouse System among Sedentary Workers Affected by Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Author

Listed:
  • Éva Anett Csuhai

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 26 Kassai st., 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Attila Csaba Nagy

    (Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 26 Kassai st., 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Zsuzsanna Váradi

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 26 Kassai st., 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Ilona Veres-Balajti

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Public Health, University of Debrecen, 26 Kassai st., 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

WHO describes “low back pain” (LBP) as the most common problem in overall occupational-related diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of spinal functionality among sedentary workers and determine usability of the SpinalMouse ® skin-surface measurement device in workplace settings in a risk population for LBP. The spinal examination was implemented at National Instruments Corporations’ Hungarian subsidiary, Debrecen in October, 2015, involving 95 white-collar employees as volunteers to assess spinal posture and functional movements. Data from the physical examination of 91 subjects (age: 34.22 ± 7.97 years) were analyzed. Results showed significant differences ( p < 0.05) in posture and mobility of the spinal regions in sitting compared to standing position. Significant positive correlations were observed between values measured in standing and sitting positions in all observed regions and aspects of the spine ( p < 0.05) except posture of lumbar extension ( p = 0.07) and mobility of sacrum/hip in E-F ( p = 0.818). Significant ( p < 0.001) difference (5.70°) was found between the spinal inclination in sitting 6.47 ± 3.55° compared to standing 0.77 ± 2.53 position. Sitting position has a negative effect on the posture and mobility of the spine among white-collar employees. The SpinalMouse can be used effectively to determine spinal posture and mobility in cross-sectional studies and impact analysis of physical exercise interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Éva Anett Csuhai & Attila Csaba Nagy & Zsuzsanna Váradi & Ilona Veres-Balajti, 2020. "Functional Analysis of the Spine with the Idiag SpinalMouse System among Sedentary Workers Affected by Non-Specific Low Back Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9259-:d:460237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Éva Anett Csuhai & Attila Csaba Nagy & Gergő József Szőllősi & Ilona Veres-Balajti, 2021. "Impact Analysis of 20-Week Multimodal Progressive Functional–Proprioceptive Training among Sedentary Workers Affected by Non-Specific Low-Back Pain: An Interventional Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-31, October.
    2. Juan Rabal-Pelay & Cristina Cimarras-Otal & Noel Marcen-Cinca & Andrés Alcázar-Crevillén & Carmen Laguna-Miranda & Ana Vanessa Bataller-Cervero, 2021. "Assessment of Spinal Range of Motion and Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Forklift Drivers. A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-9, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:24:p:9259-:d:460237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.