IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p9078-d457118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost of Care and Pattern of Medical Care Use in the Last Year of Life among Long-Term Care Insurance Beneficiaries in South Korea: Using National Claims Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sunjoo Boo

    (Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea)

  • Jungah Lee

    (Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, 71, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03082, Korea)

  • Hyunjin Oh

    (College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon 98105, Korea)

Abstract

In Korea, a substantial proportion of long-term care insurance (LTCI) beneficiaries die within 1 year of seeking the benefit. This study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of medical care use and care cost during the last year of life among Korean LTCI beneficiaries between 2009 and 2013 using the national claims data. The National Health Insurance’s Senior (NHIS-Senior) cohort was used for this retrospective study. The participants were LTCI beneficiaries aged 65 or over as of 2008 who died between 2009 and 2013 ( N = 30,433). Medical costs during the last year of life were highest for those who used both medical care services and long-term care (LTC) services and increased as death approached. About half of the participants were hospitalized at the time of death. The use of LTC services at the time of death increased from 13.0 to 22.8%, while those who died at home decreased from 34 to 20%. This study suggests that the use of LTC services did not reduce medical costs by substituting unnecessary inpatient hospitalization. Quality of dying should be considered one of the goals of older adult care, and provisions should be made for palliative care at home or LTC facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunjoo Boo & Jungah Lee & Hyunjin Oh, 2020. "Cost of Care and Pattern of Medical Care Use in the Last Year of Life among Long-Term Care Insurance Beneficiaries in South Korea: Using National Claims Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9078-:d:457118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Hongsoo & Jung, Young-Il & Kwon, Soonman, 2015. "Delivery of institutional long-term care under two social insurances: Lessons from the Korean experience," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 1330-1337.
    2. Kim, Hongsoo & Kwon, Soonman & Yoon, Nan-He & Hyun, Kyung-Rae, 2013. "Utilization of long-term care services under the public long-term care insurance program in Korea: Implications of a subsidy policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 166-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Hongsoo & Kwon, Soonman, 2021. "A decade of public long-term care insurance in South Korea: Policy lessons for aging countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 22-26.
    2. Karmann, Alexander & Sugawara, Shinya, 2022. "Comparing the German and Japanese nursing home sectors: Implications of demographic and policy differences," CEPIE Working Papers 02/22, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    3. Maaike Diepstraten & Rudy Douven & Bram Wouterse, 2019. "Can your house keep you out of a nursing home?," CPB Discussion Paper 397, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    4. Rainer Kotschy & David E. Bloom, 2022. "A Comparative Perspective on Long-Term Care Systems," NBER Working Papers 29951, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Maaike Diepstraten & Rudy Douven & Bram Wouterse, 2019. "Can your house keep you out of a nursing home?," CPB Discussion Paper 397.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Jo, Wonkwang & You, Myoungsoon, 2019. "News media’s framing of health policy and its implications for government communication: A text mining analysis of news coverage on a policy to expand health insurance coverage in South Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1116-1124.
    7. Han Hu & Zhao Zhang, 2022. "Long-Term Care Services and Insurance System in China: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Kim, Seung Hoon & Park, Eun-Cheol & Jang, Suk-Yong, 2023. "Impact of long-term care insurance on medical costs and utilization by patients with Parkinson's disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    9. Heetae Yang & Hwansoo Lee, 2018. "Exploring user acceptance of streaming media devices: an extended perspective of flow theory," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Su-Jung Lee & Min-Sun Park & Sung-Ok Chang, 2021. "Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions of Function-Focused Care Education for Nursing Home Practitioners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Chih-Hao Yang & Yen-Chi Chen & Wei Hsu & Yu-Hui Chen, 2023. "Evaluation of smart long-term care information strategy portfolio decision model: the national healthcare environment in Taiwan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(1), pages 505-536, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9078-:d:457118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.