IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p9003-d455486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Emotion Sensing Beyond ‘Affective Capture’: Advancing Critical Interdisciplinary Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Pykett

    (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK)

  • Benjamin W. Chrisinger

    (Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK)

  • Kalliopi Kyriakou

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria)

  • Tess Osborne

    (Population Research Centre, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Bernd Resch

    (Department of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
    Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA)

  • Afroditi Stathi

    (School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK)

  • Anna C. Whittaker

    (Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK)

Abstract

The use of mobile sensor methodologies in urban analytics to study ‘urban emotions’ is currently outpacing the science required to rigorously interpret the data generated. Interdisciplinary research on ‘urban stress’ could help inform urban wellbeing policies relating to healthier commuting and alleviation of work stress. The purpose of this paper is to address—through methodological experimentation—ethical, political and conceptual issues identified by critical social scientists with regards to emotion tracking, wearables and data analytics. We aim to encourage more dialogue between the critical approach and applied environmental health research. The definition of stress is not unambiguous or neutral and is mediated by the very technologies we use for research. We outline an integrative methodology in which we combine pilot field research using biosensing technologies, a novel method for identifying ‘moments of stress’ in a laboratory setting, psychometric surveys and narrative interviews on workplace and commuter stress in urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Pykett & Benjamin W. Chrisinger & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Tess Osborne & Bernd Resch & Afroditi Stathi & Anna C. Whittaker, 2020. "Urban Emotion Sensing Beyond ‘Affective Capture’: Advancing Critical Interdisciplinary Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9003-:d:455486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. TaeYoung Kim & NamIl An & JongBeom Lim, 2018. "Scientific Information System for Silk Road Education Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Gamze Dane & Pauline van den Berg & Machiel van Dorst, 2019. "A Multi-Level Path Analysis of the Relationships between the Momentary Experience Characteristics, Satisfaction with Urban Public Spaces, and Momentary- and Long-Term Subjective Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Gillian Rose, 2017. "Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation, Reinvention," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(4), pages 779-793, July.
    4. Graeme Hawthorne & Helen Herrman & Barbara Murphy, 2006. "Interpreting the WHOQOL-Brèf: Preliminary Population Norms and Effect Sizes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 37-59, May.
    5. Wheatley, Daniel, 2014. "Travel-to-work and subjective well-being: A study of UK dual career households," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 187-196.
    6. Jessica Pykett & Tess Osborne & Bernd Resch, 2020. "From Urban Stress to Neurourbanism: How Should We Research City Well-Being?," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(6), pages 1936-1951, November.
    7. Tim Schwanen & Donggen Wang, 2014. "Well-Being, Context, and Everyday Activities in Space and Time," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(4), pages 833-851, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Gamze Dane & Pauline van den Berg, 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Experiencing the City: The Relation between Urban Design and People’s Well-Being”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-6, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navarrete-Hernandez, Pablo & Christopher Zegras, P., 2023. "Mind the perception gap: The impact of bus rapid transit infrastructure on travelers’ perceptions of affective subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Gamze Dane & Pauline van den Berg, 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Experiencing the City: The Relation between Urban Design and People’s Well-Being”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-6, March.
    3. Barbora Mazúrová & Ján Kollár & Gabriela Nedelová, 2021. "Travel Mode of Commuting in Context of Subjective Well-Being—Experience from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Zuoxian Gan & Tao Feng & Min Yang, 2018. "Exploring the Effects of Car Ownership and Commuting on Subjective Well-Being: A Nationwide Questionnaire Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Dong, Han & Zhang, Jun & Cirillo, Cinzia, 2019. "Exploring, understanding, and modeling the reciprocal relation between leisure and subjective well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 813-824.
    6. Mazaher Kianpour & Stewart J. Kowalski & Harald Øverby, 2021. "Systematically Understanding Cybersecurity Economics: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Gil Solá, Ana, 2016. "Constructing work travel inequalities: The role of household gender contracts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 32-40.
    8. Agata Trzcionka & Marta Włodarczyk-Sielicka & Piotr Surmiak & Anna Szymańska & Artur Pohl & Marta Tanasiewicz, 2022. "Quality of Life Assessment in Students from Polish Universities during the COVID-19 Pandemic According to WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Tianlu Qian & Zheng Fu & Jie Chen & Shujie Qin & Changbai Xi & Jiechen Wang, 2023. "Evaluating multiscale and multimodal transport inequalities in Chinese cities with massive open-source path data," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 237-264, April.
    10. Wang, Fenglong & Mao, Zidan & Wang, Donggen, 2020. "Residential relocation and travel satisfaction change: An empirical study in Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 341-353.
    11. Jonathan Jubin & Philippe Delmas & Ingrid Gilles & Annie Oulevey Bachmann & Claudia Ortoleva Bucher, 2022. "Protective Factors and Coping Styles Associated with Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Hospital or Care Institution and Private Practice Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Tao, Yinhua & van Ham, Maarten & Petrović, Ana & Ta, Na, 2023. "A household perspective on the commuting paradox: Longitudinal relationships between commuting time and subjective wellbeing for couples in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Sarah Atkinson & Anne-Marie Bagnall & Rhiannon Corcoran & Jane South & Sarah Curtis, 2020. "Being Well Together: Individual Subjective and Community Wellbeing," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1903-1921, June.
    14. Zhenjun Zhu & Zhigang Li & Hongsheng Chen & Ye Liu & Jun Zeng, 2019. "Subjective well-being in China: how much does commuting matter?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1505-1524, August.
    15. Emily Williams & Natisha Sands & Stephen Elsom & Roshani Kanchana Prematunga, 2015. "Mental health consumers' perceptions of quality of life and mental health care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 299-306, September.
    16. Breanna K. Wright & Helen L. Kelsall & Malcolm R. Sim & David M. Clarke, 2019. "Quality of Life in Gulf War Veterans: the Influence of Recency and Persistence of Psychiatric Morbidity," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 23-38, March.
    17. Hugo Briseño & Guillermo Estefani & Alejandra Núñez-Acosta & Manuel Soto-Pérez, 2022. "Urban Risks and Their Influence on Subjective Well-being Around the World," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1617-1636, April.
    18. Lingling Su & Suhong Zhou, 2022. "Long-Term Residential Environment Exposure and Subjective Wellbeing in Later Life in Guangzhou, China: Moderated by Residential Mobility History," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Morris, Eric A., 2015. "Should we all just stay home? Travel, out-of-home activities, and life satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 519-536.
    20. Yongfeng Ma & Shuyan Chen & Aemal J. Khattak & Zheng Cao & Muhammad Zubair & Xue Han & Xiaojian Hu, 2022. "What Affects Emotional Well-Being during Travel? Identifying the Factors by Maximal Information Coefficient," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:9003-:d:455486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.