IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i23p8706-d449910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Community Psychosocial Stress Related to Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Contamination: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Eric E. Calloway

    (Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68114, USA)

  • Alethea L. Chiappone

    (Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68114, USA
    College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA)

  • Harrison J. Schmitt

    (Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA)

  • Daniel Sullivan

    (Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA)

  • Ben Gerhardstein

    (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Pamela G. Tucker

    (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Jamie Rayman

    (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA)

  • Amy L. Yaroch

    (Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE 68114, USA
    College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively explore the per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure experience and associated stressors, to inform public health efforts to support psychosocial health and resilience in affected communities. Semi-structured interviews ( n = 9) were conducted from July–September 2019 with community members and state public health department representatives from areas with PFAS-contaminated drinking water. Thematic analysis was completed and themes were described and summarized. Reported stressors included health concerns and uncertainty, institutional delegitimization and associated distrust, and financial burdens. Interviewees provided several strategies to reduce stress and promote stress coping capacity and resilience, including showing empathy and validating the normalcy of experiencing stress; building trust through visible action and sustained community engagement; providing information and actionable guidance; discussing stress carefully; fostering stress coping capacity and resilience with opportunities to build social capital and restore agency; and building capacity among government agencies and health care providers to address psychosocial stress. While communities affected by PFAS contamination will face unavoidable stressors, positive interactions with government responders and health care providers may help reduce negative stress. More research on how best to integrate community psychosocial health and stress coping and resilience concepts into the public health response to environmental contamination could be helpful in addressing these stressors.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric E. Calloway & Alethea L. Chiappone & Harrison J. Schmitt & Daniel Sullivan & Ben Gerhardstein & Pamela G. Tucker & Jamie Rayman & Amy L. Yaroch, 2020. "Exploring Community Psychosocial Stress Related to Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Contamination: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8706-:d:449910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8706/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8706/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Augustin, T. & Glass, T.A. & James, B.D. & Schwartz, B.S., 2008. "Neighborhood psychosocial hazards and cardiovascular disease: The Baltimore Memory Study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(9), pages 1664-1670.
    2. Barnes, Geoffrey & Baxter, Jamie & Litva, Andrea & Staples, Brian, 2002. "The social and psychological impact of the chemical contamination incident in Weston Village, UK: a qualitative analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 2227-2241, December.
    3. Couch, S.R. & Coles, C.J., 2011. "Community stress, Psychosocial hazards, and EPA decision-making in communities impacted by chronic technological disasters," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 140-148.
    4. Katherine A. McComas & Craig W. Trumbo, 2001. "Source Credibility in Environmental Health – Risk Controversies: Application of Meyer's Credibility Index," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 467-480, June.
    5. McEwen, B.S. & Tucker, P., 2011. "Critical biological pathways for chronic psychosocial stress and research opportunities to advance the consideration of stress in chemical risk assessment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 131-139.
    6. Yoshitake Takebayashi & Yuliya Lyamzina & Yuriko Suzuki & Michio Murakami, 2017. "Risk Perception and Anxiety Regarding Radiation after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Systematic Qualitative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marialuisa Menegatto & Sara Lezzi & Michele Musolino & Adriano Zamperini, 2022. "The Psychological Impact of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Pollution in the Veneto Region, Italy: A Qualitative Study with Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Marialuisa Menegatto & Adriano Zamperini, 2023. "Health and Psychological Concerns of Communities Affected by Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances: The Case of Residents Living in the Orange Area of the Veneto Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sullivan, Daniel & Schmitt, Harrison J. & Calloway, Eric E. & Clausen, Whitney & Tucker, Pamela & Rayman, Jamie & Gerhardstein, Ben, 2021. "Chronic environmental contamination: A narrative review of psychosocial health consequences, risk factors, and pathways to community resilience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Chris M. Messer & Alison E. Adams & Thomas E. Shriver, 2019. "Living with chronic contamination: a comparative analysis of divergent psychosocial impacts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 895-911, November.
    3. Eerika Finell & Jouko Nätti, 2019. "The Combined Effect of Poor Perceived Indoor Environmental Quality and Psychosocial Stressors on Long-Term Sickness Absence in the Workplace: A Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Walker, Chad & Baxter, Jamie & Ouellette, Danielle, 2015. "Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 358-365.
    5. Michio Murakami & Yoshitake Takebayashi & Yoshihito Takeda & Akiko Sato & Yasumasa Igarashi & Kazumi Sano & Tetsuo Yasutaka & Wataru Naito & Sumire Hirota & Aya Goto & Tetsuya Ohira & Seiji Yasumura &, 2018. "Effect of Radiological Countermeasures on Subjective Well-Being and Radiation Anxiety after the 2011 Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Yuya Kashiwazaki & Hitomi Matsunaga & Makiko Orita & Yasuyuki Taira & Keiko Oishi & Noboru Takamura, 2022. "Occupational Difficulties of Disaster-Affected Local Government Employees in the Long-Term Recovery Phase after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, March.
    7. Koya Ogura & Masahiro Hosoda & Yuki Tamakuma & Takahito Suzuki & Ryohei Yamada & Ryoju Negami & Takakiyo Tsujiguchi & Masaru Yamaguchi & Yoshitaka Shiroma & Kazuki Iwaoka & Naofumi Akata & Mayumi Shim, 2021. "Discriminative Measurement of Absorbed Dose Rates in Air from Natural and Artificial Radionuclides in Namie Town, Fukushima Prefecture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Masatsugu Orui & Maiko Fukasawa & Naoko Horikoshi & Yuriko Suzuki & Norito Kawakami, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of a Gatekeeper Training Program Regarding Anxiety about Radiation Health Effects Following a Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Single-Arm Intervention Pilot Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Roel Plant & Spike Boydell & Jason Prior & Joanne Chong & Aleta Lederwasch, 2017. "From liability to opportunity: An institutional approach towards value-based land remediation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(2), pages 197-220, March.
    10. Gary S. Young & Mary A. Fox & Michael Trush & Norma Kanarek & Thomas A. Glass & Frank C. Curriero, 2012. "Differential Exposure to Hazardous Air Pollution in the United States: A Multilevel Analysis of Urbanization and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Álvaro Antón-Sancho & Georgios Lampropoulos & Diego Vergara, 2024. "Emerging Trends and Challenges in Pink Hydrogen Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Xizheng Xu & Ying Fan & Yunpeng Wu & Senlin Zhou, 2022. "Authenticity Mediates the Relationship between Risk Perception of COVID-19 and Subjective Well-Being: A Daily Diary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-11, October.
    13. Jérôme Boutang & Michel de Lara, 2016. "Risk Marketing," Working Papers hal-01353821, HAL.
    14. Margaret M. MacDonell & Richard C. Hertzberg & Glenn E. Rice & J. Michael Wright & Linda K. Teuschler, 2018. "Characterizing Risk for Cumulative Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1183-1201, June.
    15. Browning, Christopher R. & Cagney, Kathleen A. & Iveniuk, James, 2012. "Neighborhood stressors and cardiovascular health: Crime and C-reactive protein in Dallas, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1271-1279.
    16. Marialuisa Menegatto & Sara Lezzi & Michele Musolino & Adriano Zamperini, 2022. "The Psychological Impact of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Pollution in the Veneto Region, Italy: A Qualitative Study with Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Stephanie T Broyles & Amanda E Staiano & Kathryn T Drazba & Alok K Gupta & Melinda Sothern & Peter T Katzmarzyk, 2012. "Elevated C-Reactive Protein in Children from Risky Neighborhoods: Evidence for a Stress Pathway Linking Neighborhoods and Inflammation in Children," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8, September.
    18. O'Brien, Daniel T. & Farrell, Chelsea & Welsh, Brandon C., 2019. "Broken (windows) theory: A meta-analysis of the evidence for the pathways from neighborhood disorder to resident health outcomes and behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 272-292.
    19. Cheryl R Clark & Mark J Ommerborn & DeMarc A Hickson & Kya N Grooms & Mario Sims & Herman A Taylor & Michelle A Albert, 2013. "Neighborhood Disadvantage, Neighborhood Safety and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in African Americans: Biosocial Associations in the Jackson Heart Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Jenkins, August I.C. & Surachman, Agus & Armendariz, Marina, 2024. "Where I'm Livin’ and How I'm Feelin’: Associations among community stress, gender, and mental-emotional health among Black Americans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:23:p:8706-:d:449910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.