IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8570-d447341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Danica Janicijevic

    (Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Olivera M. Knezevic

    (Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia
    Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11129 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Amador Garcia-Ramos

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain
    Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile)

  • Danilo Cvetic

    (Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan M. Mirkov

    (Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Background: Isokinetic testing has been routinely used to assess the capacities of individual muscle groups. In this study we aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the force-point (F-v) relationship assessed through the two-point method to discriminate between antagonist muscle groups and males with different physical activity levels. Methods: The concentric force output of the knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder flexors and extensors of 27 active and 13 non-active men was recorded at 60 and 180°/s to determine the F-v relationship parameters (maximum force [ F 0 ], maximum velocity [ v 0 ], and maximum power [P max ]). Results: F 0 and P max were higher for knee extensors (effect size [ES] = 1.97 and 0.57, respectively), hip extensors (ES = 2.52 and 0.77, respectively), and shoulder flexors (ES = 1.67 and 0.83, respectively) compared to their antagonist muscles, while v 0 was higher for knee flexors compared to knee extensors (ES = 0.59). Active males revealed higher F 0 for knee extensors (ES = 0.72) and knee flexors (ES = 0.83) and higher P max for knee flexors (ES = 0.70), elbow extensors (ES = 0.83) and shoulder extensors (ES = 0.36). Conclusions: The sensitivity of the two-point method for testing the maximal mechanical capacities was high for the knee, moderate for the hip and shoulder, and low for the elbow joint.

Suggested Citation

  • Danica Janicijevic & Olivera M. Knezevic & Amador Garcia-Ramos & Danilo Cvetic & Dragan M. Mirkov, 2020. "Isokinetic Testing: Sensitivity of the Force-Velocity Relationship Assessed through the Two-Point Method to Discriminate between Muscle Groups and Participants’ Physical Activity Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8570-:d:447341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuren Yan & Yonghwan Kim & Yongchul Choi, 2022. "Aerobic and Anaerobic Fitness according to High-Intensity Interval Training Frequency in Youth Soccer Players in the Last Stage of Rehabilitation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    flexors; extensors; knee; hip; elbow; shoulder;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8570-:d:447341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.