IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8510-d446265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Value of Electronic Medical Records in Community Health Services: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Workers in Mainland China

Author

Listed:
  • Zining Xia

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • WenJuan Gao

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • Xuejuan Wei

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • Yingchun Peng

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • Hongjun Ran

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • Hao Wu

    (Fangzhuang Community Health Service Center of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100078, China)

  • Chaojie Liu

    (School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the degree to which electronic medical records (EMRs) were used in primary care and the value of EMRs as perceived by primary care workers in China. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 2719 physicians ( n = 2213) and nurses ( n = 506) selected from 462 community health centres across all regions of mainland China except for Tibet. Regional differences in the responses regarding the functionality of existing EMR systems and the perceived value of EMRs were examined using Chi-square tests and ordinal regression analyses. Results: Less than 59% of the community health centres had adopted EMRs. More than 89% of the respondents believed that it was necessary to adopt EMRs in primary care. Of the existing EMR systems, 50% had access to telehealth support for laboratory, imaging or patient consultation services. Only 38.4% captured data that met all task needs and 35.4% supported referral arrangements. “Management of chronic conditions” was voted (66%) as the top preferred feature of EMRs. Higher levels of recognition of the value of EMRs were found in the relatively more developed eastern region compared with their counterparts in other regions. Conclusions: Rapid EMR adoption in primary care is evident in mainland China. The low level of functionality in data acquisition and referral arrangements runs counter to the requirements for “management of chronic conditions”, the most preferred feature of EMRs in primary care. Regional disparities in the realised value of EMRs in primary care deserve policy attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Zining Xia & WenJuan Gao & Xuejuan Wei & Yingchun Peng & Hongjun Ran & Hao Wu & Chaojie Liu, 2020. "Perceived Value of Electronic Medical Records in Community Health Services: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Workers in Mainland China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8510-:d:446265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:7826 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Bo & Chen, Juan & Howard, Natasha, 2023. "Community nursing delivery in urban China: A social power perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    2. Bo Li & Juan Chen, 2022. "Barriers to Community-Based Primary Health Care Delivery in Urban China: A Systematic Mapping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8510-:d:446265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.