IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i22p8421-d444816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpersonal Psychotherapy to Reduce Psychological Distress in Perinatal Women: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine S. Bright

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
    Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2W 1S7, Canada)

  • Elyse M. Charrois

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Muhammad Kashif Mughal

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Abdul Wajid

    (Epidemiologist, Calgary, AB T3A 0P6, Canada)

  • Deborah McNeil

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
    Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2W 1S7, Canada
    Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB T2N 4V1, Canada)

  • Scott Stuart

    (IPT Institute, Coralville, IA 52241, USA)

  • K. Alix Hayden

    (Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Dawn Kingston

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
    Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI), Calgary, AB T2N 4V1, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a psychological intervention with established efficacy in the prevention and treatment of depressive disorders. Previous systematic reviews have not evaluated the effectiveness of IPT on symptoms of stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, relationship satisfaction/quality, social supports, and an improved psychological sense of wellbeing. There is limited information regarding moderating and mediating factors that impact the effectiveness of IPT such as the timing of the intervention or the mode of delivery of IPT intervention. The overall objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of IPT interventions to treat perinatal (from pregnancy up to 12 months postpartum) psychological distress. Methods: MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (OVID), CINAHL with Full Text (Ebsco), Social Work Abstracts (Ebsco), SocINDEX with Full Text (Ebsco), Academic Search Complete (Ebsco), Family & Society Studies Worldwide (Ebsco), Family Studies Abstracts (Ebsco), and Scopus databases were searched from inception until 31 January 2019. Two researchers independently screened articles for eligibility. Of the 685 screened articles, 43 met the inclusion criteria. The search was re-run on 11 May 2020. An additional 204 articles were screened and two met the inclusion criteria, resulting in a total of 45 studies included in this review. There were 25 Randomized Controlled Trials, 10 Quasi-experimental studies, eight Open Trials, and two Single Case Studies. All included studies were critically appraised for quality. Results: In most studies (n = 24, 53%), the IPT intervention was delivered individually; in 17 (38%) studies IPT was delivered in a group setting and two (4%) studies delivered the intervention as a combination of group and individual IPT. Most interventions were initiated during pregnancy (n = 27, 60%), with the remaining 18 (40%) studies initiating interventions during the postpartum period. Limitations: This review included only English-language articles and peer-reviewed literature. It excluded government reports, dissertations, conference papers, and reviews. This limited the access to grassroots or community-based recruitment and retention strategies that may have been used to target smaller or marginalized groups of perinatal women. Conclusions: IPT is an effective intervention for the prevention and treatment of psychological distress in women during their pregnancy and postpartum period. As a treatment intervention, IPT is effective in significantly reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety as well as improving social support, relationship quality/satisfaction, and adjustment. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019114292.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine S. Bright & Elyse M. Charrois & Muhammad Kashif Mughal & Abdul Wajid & Deborah McNeil & Scott Stuart & K. Alix Hayden & Dawn Kingston, 2020. "Interpersonal Psychotherapy to Reduce Psychological Distress in Perinatal Women: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-48, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8421-:d:444816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8421/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8421/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling‐ling Gao & Shu‐yuan Luo & Sally Wai‐chi Chan, 2012. "Interpersonal psychotherapy‐oriented program for Chinese pregnant women: Delivery, content, and personal impact," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 318-324, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harmeet Kaur Kang & Bandana Bisht & Manmeet Kaur & Obrey Alexis & Aaron Worsley & Denny John, 2024. "Effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy in comparison to other psychological and pharmacological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in women diagnosed with postpartum depression in lo," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brandon A. Kohrt & Laura Asher & Anvita Bhardwaj & Mina Fazel & Mark J. D. Jordans & Byamah B. Mutamba & Abhijit Nadkarni & Gloria A. Pedersen & Daisy R. Singla & Vikram Patel, 2018. "The Role of Communities in Mental Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Meta-Review of Components and Competencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-31, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8421-:d:444816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.