Author
Listed:
- Katarzyna Lewandowska
(Department of Anaesthesiology Nursing & Intensive Care, Medical University in Gdansk, 80211 Gdansk, Poland)
- Magdalena Weisbrot
(Intensive Care Unit, University Clinical Centre in Gdansk, 80211 Gdansk, Poland)
- Aleksandra Cieloszyk
(Independent Team of Physiotherapists, University Clinical Centre in Gdansk, 80211 Gdansk, Poland)
- Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska
(Department of Anaesthesiology Nursing & Intensive Care, Medical University in Gdansk, 80211 Gdansk, Poland)
- Sabina Krupa
(Departament of Emergency, Institute of Health Sciences Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35310 Rzeszow, Poland)
- Dorota Ozga
(Departament of Emergency, Institute of Health Sciences Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35310 Rzeszow, Poland)
Abstract
Background: In conditions of intensive therapy, where the patients treated are in a critical condition, alarms are omnipresent. Nurses, as they spend most of their time with patients, monitoring their condition 24 h, are particularly exposed to so-called alarm fatigue. The purpose of this study is to review the literature available on the perception of clinical alarms by nursing personnel and its impact on work in the ICU environment. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol. The content of electronic databases was searched through, i.e., PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, ProQuest Nursery, and Cochrane Library. The keywords used in the search included: “intensive care unit,” “nurse,” “alarm fatigue,” “workload,” and “clinical alarm.” The review also covered studies carried out among nurses employed at an adult intensive care unit. Finally, seven publications were taken into consideration. Data were analyzed both descriptively and quantitatively, calculating a weighted average for specific synthetized data. Results: In the analyzed studies, 389 nurses were tested, working in different intensive care units. Two studies were based on a quality model, while the other five described the problem of alarms in terms of quantity, based on the HTF (Healthcare Technology Foundation) questionnaire. Intensive care nurses think that alarms are burdensome and too frequent, interfering with caring for patients and causing reduced trust in alarm systems. They feel overburdened with an excessive amount of duties and a continuous wave of alarms. Having to operate modern equipment, which is becoming more and more advanced, takes time that nurses would prefer to dedicate to their patients. There is no clear system for managing the alarms of monitoring devices. Conclusion: Alarm fatigue may have serious consequences, both for patients and for nursing personnel. It is necessary to introduce a strategy of alarm management and for measuring the alarm fatigue level.
Suggested Citation
Katarzyna Lewandowska & Magdalena Weisbrot & Aleksandra Cieloszyk & Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska & Sabina Krupa & Dorota Ozga, 2020.
"Impact of Alarm Fatigue on the Work of Nurses in an Intensive Care Environment—A Systematic Review,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8409-:d:444618
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Soo-Joung Lee & Yun-Mi Lee & Eun Ji Seo & Youn-Jung Son, 2021.
"Impact of Hospital Nurses’ Perception on Clinical Alarms and Patient Safety Culture on Alarm Management Practice,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
- Sabina Krupa & Adriano Friganović & Ber Oomen & Snježana Benko & Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, 2022.
"Nurses’ Knowledge about Delirium in the Group of Intensive Care Units Patients,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-9, February.
- Łukasz Rypicz & Anna Rozensztrauch & Olga Fedorowicz & Aleksander Włodarczyk & Katarzyna Zatońska & Raúl Juárez-Vela & Izabela Witczak, 2023.
"Polish Adaptation of the Alarm Fatigue Assessment Questionnaire as an Element of Improving Patient Safety,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:22:p:8409-:d:444618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.