IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8289-d442274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive Performance Models in Long-Distance Runners: A Narrative Review

Author

Listed:
  • José Ramón Alvero-Cruz

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of Málaga, Andalucía TECH, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Elvis A. Carnero

    (AdventHealth Translational Research Institute, AdventHealth Oralndo, Orlando, FL 32804, USA)

  • Manuel Avelino Giráldez García

    (Faculty of Sports Science and Physical Education, University of A Coruña, 15179 Oleiros, Spain)

  • Fernando Alacid

    (Department of Education, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain)

  • Lorena Correas-Gómez

    (Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Málaga, Andalucía TECH, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Thomas Rosemann

    (Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Pantelis T. Nikolaidis

    (School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)

  • Beat Knechtle

    (Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Physiological variables such as maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max), velocity at maximal oxygen uptake ( v VO 2 max), running economy (RE) and changes in lactate levels are considered the main factors determining performance in long-distance races. The aim of this review was to present the mathematical models available in the literature to estimate performance in the 5000 m, 10,000 m, half-marathon and marathon events. Eighty-eight articles were identified, selections were made based on the inclusion criteria and the full text of the articles were obtained. The articles were reviewed and categorized according to demographic, anthropometric, exercise physiology and field test variables were also included by athletic specialty. A total of 58 studies were included, from 1983 to the present, distributed in the following categories: 12 in the 5000 m, 13 in the 10,000 m, 12 in the half-marathon and 21 in the marathon. A total of 136 independent variables associated with performance in long-distance races were considered, 43.4% of which pertained to variables derived from the evaluation of aerobic metabolism, 26.5% to variables associated with training load and 20.6% to anthropometric variables, body composition and somatotype components. The most closely associated variables in the prediction models for the half and full marathon specialties were the variables obtained from the laboratory tests (VO 2 max, v VO 2 max), training variables (training pace, training load) and anthropometric variables (fat mass, skinfolds). A large gap exists in predicting time in long-distance races, based on field tests. Physiological effort assessments are almost exclusive to shorter specialties (5000 m and 10,000 m). The predictor variables of the half-marathon are mainly anthropometric, but with moderate coefficients of determination. The variables of note in the marathon category are fundamentally those associated with training and those derived from physiological evaluation and anthropometric parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • José Ramón Alvero-Cruz & Elvis A. Carnero & Manuel Avelino Giráldez García & Fernando Alacid & Lorena Correas-Gómez & Thomas Rosemann & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Beat Knechtle, 2020. "Predictive Performance Models in Long-Distance Runners: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8289-:d:442274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mabliny Thuany & Raphael F. de Souza & Lee Hill & João Lino Mesquita & Thomas Rosemann & Beat Knechtle & Sara Pereira & Thayse Natacha Gomes, 2021. "Discriminant Analysis of Anthropometric and Training Variables among Runners of Different Competitive Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Milena Tomovic & Alexandros Toliopoulos & Nikolaos Koutlianos & Anastasios Dalkiranis & Sasa Bubanj & Asterios Deligiannis & Evangelia Kouidi, 2022. "Correlation between Cardiopulmonary Indices and Running Performance in a 14.5 km Endurance Running Event," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8289-:d:442274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.