IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8215-d441142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Early Mother–Infant and Father–Infant Interactions: A Comparison between Assisted Reproductive Technology and Spontaneous Conceiving Parents

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Agostini

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Federica Andrei

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Erica Neri

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Elena Trombini

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Francesca Nuccini

    (Department of Neonatology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Maria Teresa Villani

    (Center of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Aguzzoli

    (Center of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Marcella Paterlini

    (Department of Obstetrics and Pediatrics, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

Abstract

This study aims to describe parents’ and infant’s interactive styles after assisted reproduction treatments (ART), to compare them with parent–infant interactions after spontaneous conception (SC), and to assess the effect of specific ART variables (cause of infertility, treatment type, and previous ART attempts) on interaction quality. The sample included 25 ART conceiving couples and 31 SC couples with their 3-months-old babies. Free parent–infant interactions (3–5 min) were coded using the CARE-Index, a video-based assessment scale that gives both dimensional (e.g., sensitivity, control, passivity) and categorical scores (sensitive, inept, at-risk) for parents and infants. Results showed a global similarity between groups in CARE-Index dimensions. Nevertheless, differences emerged in categorical scores, as the interactive patterns of ART parents were more frequently classified as “inept” and “at-risk” compared to SC parents. With regards to ART dyads only, infants conceived through intracytoplasmic sperm injection scored significantly lower to the dimension compulsivity and higher to passivity, compared to infants conceived through in vitro fertilization. Yet, infants conceived at the first ART cycle had significantly lower levels of difficulty than infants conceived after one ART attempt. These results speak about the existence of important parent–infant interactive differences related to conception modality and ART technique and suggest the need to implement support programs to promote more sensitive parenting styles.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Agostini & Federica Andrei & Erica Neri & Elena Trombini & Francesca Nuccini & Maria Teresa Villani & Lorenzo Aguzzoli & Marcella Paterlini, 2020. "Characteristics of Early Mother–Infant and Father–Infant Interactions: A Comparison between Assisted Reproductive Technology and Spontaneous Conceiving Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8215-:d:441142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luca Cerniglia & Silvia Cimino, 2020. "Special Issue: Parent–Child Interactions: Paths of Intergenerational Transmission of Psychopathological Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-4, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8215-:d:441142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.