IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7914-d436248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surveillance of Zoonotic Parasites in Animals Involved in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs)

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Simonato

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Patrizia Danesi

    (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, viale dell’Università 10, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Antonio Frangipane di Regalbono

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Giorgia Dotto

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Cinzia Tessarin

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Mario Pietrobelli

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

  • Daniela Pasotto

    (Department of Animal Medicine Production and Health, University of Padova, viale dell’Università 16, Legnaro, 35020 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are based on the establishment of a therapeutic relationship between animals and beneficiaries that is certain to provide positive effects, while currently, it reads as if AAIs aim at exposing stakeholders to potential risk of infection. The surveillance of zoonotic pathogens is necessary for guaranteeing common health. This study investigated the presence of potentially zoonotic parasites, including dermatophytes, in animals involved in AAIs. Between 2015 and 2017, 190 animals (equids, dogs, cats, birds, rabbits, rodents, and goats) were investigated. Anamnestic and management data were recorded. Individual faecal samples were analysed using a copromicroscopic procedure. Fur and skin were examined for ectoparasites during clinical examinations, and samples for mycological investigation were collected by brushing. Parasites were described in 60 (31.6%) investigated animals. Thirteen out of the 60 (21.7%) animals harboured potentially zoonotic parasites, mainly recovered in dogs (Ancylostomatidae, Eucoleus aerophilus , Toxocara canis , and Giardia duodenalis ) and a cat ( G. duodenalis ). Nannizzia gypsea and Paraphyton mirabile , potential agents of cutaneous mycosis, were isolated in a dog and a horse, respectively. No ectoparasites were found. AAIs might represent a source of infections either directly or via environmental contamination. Thus, active surveillance is necessary and animal screenings should be planned and scheduled according to the risk of exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Simonato & Patrizia Danesi & Antonio Frangipane di Regalbono & Giorgia Dotto & Cinzia Tessarin & Mario Pietrobelli & Daniela Pasotto, 2020. "Surveillance of Zoonotic Parasites in Animals Involved in Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAIs)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7914-:d:436248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Santaniello & Ilaria Cimmino & Ludovico Dipineto & Ayewa Lawoe Agognon & Francesco Beguinot & Pietro Formisano & Alessandro Fioretti & Lucia Francesca Menna & Francesco Oriente, 2021. "Zoonotic Risk of Encephalitozoon cuniculi in Animal-Assisted Interventions: Laboratory Strategies for the Diagnosis of Infections in Humans and Animals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Crina Cotoc & Stephen Notaro, 2022. "Race, Zoonoses and Animal Assisted Interventions in Pediatric Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7914-:d:436248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.