IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7909-d436128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge

Author

Listed:
  • Kristine Ek

    (NCC AB, Gullbergs Strandgata 2, 405 14 Göteborg, Sweden
    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 6, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Alexandre Mathern

    (NCC AB, Gullbergs Strandgata 2, 405 14 Göteborg, Sweden
    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 6, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Rasmus Rempling

    (NCC AB, Gullbergs Strandgata 2, 405 14 Göteborg, Sweden
    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 6, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Petra Brinkhoff

    (NCC AB, Gullbergs Strandgata 2, 405 14 Göteborg, Sweden)

  • Mats Karlsson

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 6, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
    Swedish Transport Administration, Bataljonsgatan 8, 553 05 Jönköping, Sweden)

  • Malin Norin

    (NCC AB, Gullbergs Strandgata 2, 405 14 Göteborg, Sweden)

Abstract

Standardized and transparent life cycle sustainability performance assessment methods are essential for improving the sustainability of civil engineering works. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of using a life cycle sustainability assessment method in a road bridge case study. The method is in line with requirements of relevant standards, uses life cycle assessment, life cycle costs and incomes, and environmental externalities, and applies normalization and weighting of indicators. The case study involves a short-span bridge in a design-build infrastructure project, which was selected for its generality. Two bridge design concepts are assessed and compared: a concrete slab frame bridge and a soil-steel composite bridge. Data available in the contractor’s tender phase are used. The two primary aims of this study are (1) to analyse the practical application potential of the method in carrying out transparent sustainability assessments of design concepts in the early planning and design stages, and (2) to examine the results obtained in the case study to identify indicators in different life cycle stages and elements of the civil engineering works project with the largest impacts on sustainability. The results show that the method facilitates comparisons of the life cycle sustainability performance of design concepts at the indicator and construction element levels, enabling better-informed and more impartial design decisions to be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristine Ek & Alexandre Mathern & Rasmus Rempling & Petra Brinkhoff & Mats Karlsson & Malin Norin, 2020. "Life Cycle Sustainability Performance Assessment Method for Comparison of Civil Engineering Works Design Concepts: Case Study of a Bridge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-34, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7909-:d:436128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7909/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7909/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Studziński & Jacek Ścigałło & Maria Ratajczak & Katarzyna Ciesielczyk, 2024. "Impact of Heterogeneous Soil Conditions on the Life Cycle Assessment of a Multi-Storey Reinforced Concrete Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Liang Xiao & Yong Zhou & He Huang & Yu-Jie Liu & Ke Li & Meng-Yao Li & Yang Tian & Fei Wu, 2020. "Application of Geostatistical Analysis and Random Forest for Source Analysis and Human Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Arable Land Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7909-:d:436128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.