IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7894-d435933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Function Analysis and its Potential Utility as a Tool for the Assessment of Health-and-Wellness Programs in Indigenous Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Eric N. Liberda

    (School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Aleksandra M. Zuk

    (Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
    School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Ian D. Martin

    (Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada)

  • Leonard J. S. Tsuji

    (Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada)

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a growing public health problem affecting persons in both developed and developing nations. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is reported to be several times higher among Indigenous populations compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. Discriminant function analysis (DFA) is a potential tool that can be used to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of Indigenous health-and-wellness programs (e.g., on-the-land programs, T2DM interventions), by creating a type of pre-and-post-program scoring system. As the communities of the Eeyou Istchee territory, subarctic Quebec, Canada, have varying degrees of isolation, we derived a DFA tool for point-of-contact evaluations to aid in monitoring and assessment of health-and-wellness programs in rural and remote locations. We developed several DFA models to discriminate between those with and without T2DM status using age, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, waist girth, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and total cholesterol in participants from the Eeyou Istchee. The models showed a ~97% specificity (i.e., true positives for non-T2DM) in classification. This study highlights how varying risk factor models can be used to discriminate those without T2DM with high specificity among James Bay Cree communities in Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric N. Liberda & Aleksandra M. Zuk & Ian D. Martin & Leonard J. S. Tsuji, 2020. "Fisher’s Linear Discriminant Function Analysis and its Potential Utility as a Tool for the Assessment of Health-and-Wellness Programs in Indigenous Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7894-:d:435933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7894/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7894/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Scully, 2012. "Diabetes in numbers," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 2-3, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenzhu Tang & Zhifeng Fang & Wei Huang & Zhanhua Liu & Yuzhu Chen & Zhongyou Li & Ting Zhu & Qichun Wang & Steve Simpson & Bruce V. Taylor & Rui Lin, 2016. "Non-Obese Diabetes and Its Associated Factors in an Underdeveloped Area of South China, Guangxi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Peter Gan Kim Soon & Soo Kun Lim & Sanjay Rampal & Tin Tin Su, 2019. "A qualitative examination of barriers and solutions to renal transplantation in Malaysia: Key-informants’ perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Karen Schellong & Sandra Schulz & Thomas Harder & Andreas Plagemann, 2012. "Birth Weight and Long-Term Overweight Risk: Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis Including 643,902 Persons from 66 Studies and 26 Countries Globally," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-1, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7894-:d:435933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.