IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7665-d432171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Research in Indonesian Youth: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Fitria D. Andriyani

    (Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield 4300, Australia
    Department of Sports Education, Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Stuart J.H. Biddle

    (Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield 4300, Australia)

  • Novita I. Arovah

    (Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Sports Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Katrien De Cocker

    (Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield 4300, Australia)

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to map physical activity and sedentary behaviour research trends, designs, and topics for Indonesian youth. Methods: This review conforms to the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).” A systematic search on eight platforms was performed in August 2018 and was updated in April 2020. Results: From 10,753 documents screened, 166 met the selection criteria. Over half of the studies were cross-sectional, and the majority utilized self-reported measurements (physical activity: 81.1%, sedentary behavior: 88.5%). More than two-thirds of the studies examined physical activity only (67.5%). The top three subtopics reported were prevalence/measurement, correlates, and outcomes of physical activity (28%, 24.6%, and 17%, respectively). The prevalence of “sufficient” physical activity ranges between 12.2% and 52.3%, while the prevalence of sedentary behavior ≥3 h per day ranges between 24.5% and 33.8%. Conclusions: Future studies need to focus more on intervention and validation, and research needs to be conducted more with nationally representative samples and on youth at the junior high school level. Future studies need to investigate more on psychological, cognitive, affective, social, cultural, and environmental correlates, and in-depth personal views of physical activity and sedentary behavior. More studies using device-based measurements, longitudinal designs, as well as qualitative and mixed-methods approaches are warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Fitria D. Andriyani & Stuart J.H. Biddle & Novita I. Arovah & Katrien De Cocker, 2020. "Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Research in Indonesian Youth: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7665-:d:432171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asaduzzaman Khan & Riaz Uddin & Eun-Young Lee & Mark S. Tremblay, 2019. "Sitting time among adolescents across 26 Asia–Pacific countries: a population-based study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(8), pages 1129-1138, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7665-:d:432171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.