Author
Listed:
- Felix Martin Hofmann
(Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany
Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany)
- Edward Olawumi
(Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany)
- Martina Michaelis
(Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany)
- Friedrich Hofmann
(Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany)
- Ulrich Stößel
(Research Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), 79098 Freiburg, Germany)
Abstract
It is commonly accepted that the number of officially reported incidences of norovirus (NoV) according to the German Protection against Infection Act ( Infektionsschutzgesetz ) does not reflect the ‘true’ incidence of NoV in Germany. This study aims to reveal the reasons for the underreporting of NoV cases by comparing secondary data. Methods: NoV incidence (cases per 100,000 reference persons) in the age group 18–65 was derived from register data of four different sources in the German public health system (2011–2015): Statutory health insurance in the federal state of Lower Saxony (AOK; in- and outpatient cases), the Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care in Germany (ZI; outpatient cases), the German Federal Statistical Office (inpatient cases; DESTATIS), and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI SurvStat; health reporting data). Results: the incidence derived from the AOK in Lower Saxony varied between 49 and 66 NoV cases per 100,000 persons and was thus lower than at the federal level. Incidences of all inpatient and outpatient data were lower than the incidence according to the RKI in the last 2–3 years of the observation period. Conclusions: the disagreement between NoV incidences calculated from secondary inpatient and outpatient data and the respective numbers published by the RKI can be regarded as an indication that not all NoV cases were reported to public health authorities. This might be due to missed cases during the notification procedure or misclassification of gastroenteritis cases by general practitioners. Considering the limitations associated with analyzing secondary data, the appropriateness of these assumptions should be verified in future studies.
Suggested Citation
Felix Martin Hofmann & Edward Olawumi & Martina Michaelis & Friedrich Hofmann & Ulrich Stößel, 2020.
"Challenges in Infection Epidemiology: On the Underreporting of Norovirus Gastroenteritis Cases in Germany,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:314-:d:304347
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:314-:d:304347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.