IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7325-d424677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of Mainstream and Special-Education Teachers toward Intellectual Disability in Italy: The Relevance of Being Teachers

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Arcangeli

    (Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences, and Education, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini, 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Alice Bacherini

    (Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences, and Education, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini, 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Cristina Gaggioli

    (Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences, and Education, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini, 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Moira Sannipoli

    (Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences, and Education, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini, 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

  • Giulia Balboni

    (Department of Philosophy, Social and Human Sciences, and Education, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Piazza G. Ermini, 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy)

Abstract

The attitudes of teachers toward intellectual disability (ID) contribute to an effective school inclusion of students with ID, thereby enhancing their quality of life. The present study was aimed at investigating the attitude differences toward ID of mainstream and special-education teachers in Italy and the general and specific teachers’ characteristics most related to these attitudes. An online version of the Attitudes toward Intellectual Disability (ATTID) questionnaire was filled by 307 mainstream teachers and 237 special-education teachers. The findings show that special-education teachers held more positive attitudes. Specific ATTID dimensions were positively affected for both types of teachers by previous training in special education/ID, perceived support, and promotion of positive attitudes toward ID, in addition to the quality of relationships with individuals with ID, while they were positively affected for special-education teachers by perceived efficacy of ID knowledge. No or very limited effects were observed for previous experience in teaching students with typical development or ID (even with severe/profound ID). Fostering resources to provide teachers with high-quality training, support, and resources and strategies to promote positive attitudes toward ID seems a relevant approach leading to favorable attitudes, thereby improving the quality of life of students with ID.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Arcangeli & Alice Bacherini & Cristina Gaggioli & Moira Sannipoli & Giulia Balboni, 2020. "Attitudes of Mainstream and Special-Education Teachers toward Intellectual Disability in Italy: The Relevance of Being Teachers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7325-:d:424677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandra Wolska & Alicja Malina, 2020. "Personality and attitudes towards people with mental disorders: Preliminary studies results," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(3), pages 270-278, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Medina-García & Lina Higueras-Rodríguez & Mª del Mar García-Vita & Luis Doña-Toledo, 2021. "ICT, Disability, and Motivation: Validation of a Measurement Scale and Consequence Model for Inclusive Digital Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7325-:d:424677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.