IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7254-d423626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Assessment of Three Types of Drinking Water Sources in Guinea-Bissau

Author

Listed:
  • Aducabe Bancessi

    (Nova School of Business and Economics, Nova University of Lisbon, Campus de Carcavelos, Rua da Holanda, n.1, 2775-405 Lisbon, Portugal
    Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Luís Catarino

    (Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Maria José Silva

    (Plant-Environment Interactions & Biodiversity Lab (PlantStress&Biodiversity), Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food Unit (LEAF), Institute of Agronomy ISA, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Armindo Ferreira

    (National Laboratory of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health (INASA), Avenida Combatentes da Liberdade da Pátria, Bissau 1004, Guinea-Bissau)

  • Elizabeth Duarte

    (Department of Sciences and Engineering of Biosystems, Institute of Agronomy ISA, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Teresa Nazareth

    (Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nova University of Lisbon, Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The lack of access to safe drinking water causes important health problems, mainly in developing countries. In the West African country Guinea-Bissau, waterborne diseases are recognised by WHO as major infectious diseases. This study analysed the microbiological and physicochemical parameters of drinking water in the capital Bissau and its surroundings. Twenty-two sites belonging to different water sources (piped water, tubewells and shallow wells) were surveyed twice a day for three weeks, in both dry and wet seasons. Most of the microbiological parameters were out of the acceptable ranges in all types of water and both seasons and tended to worsen in the wet season. Moreover, in Bissau, the levels of faecal contamination in piped water increased from the holes to the consumer (tap/fountain). Several physicochemical variables showed values out of the internationally accepted ranges. Both well sources showed low-pH water (4.87–5.59), with high nitrite and iron levels in the wet season and high hexavalent chromium concentration in the dry season. The residual chlorine never reached the minimum recommended level in any of the water sources or seasons, suggesting a high risk of contamination. Results reveal a lack of quality in the three water sources analysed, coherent with the high number of diarrheal cases in the country. There is an urgent need to improve sanitarian conditions to reduce the disease burden caused by these waterborne illnesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Aducabe Bancessi & Luís Catarino & Maria José Silva & Armindo Ferreira & Elizabeth Duarte & Teresa Nazareth, 2020. "Quality Assessment of Three Types of Drinking Water Sources in Guinea-Bissau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7254-:d:423626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7254-:d:423626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.