IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7195-d422609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study among Taiwanese People Aged over 50 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Mei-Chun Lu

    (Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
    . Department of Family Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan Branch, Taoyuan City 33378, Taiwan
    . College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan)

  • Wei-Ching Fang

    (Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Cheng Li

    (Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
    . College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan
    . Department of Health Management, Xiamen Chang-Gung Hospital, Xiamen 361000, China)

  • Wei-Chung Yeh

    (Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Hua Shieh

    (. Department of Family Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City 23652, Taiwan)

  • Jau-Yuan Chen

    (Department of Family Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
    . College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background and Aims: Previous studies have implied that insulin resistance (IR) could represent a major underlying abnormality leading to cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between IR (estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) index) and CVD risk among middle-aged and elderly Taiwanese individuals. Methods: In this cross-sectional, community-based study, a total of 320 participants were interviewed to collect demographical parameters and blood samples. The recruited participants were divided into tertiles according to their levels of HOMA-IR. The Framingham risk score (FRS) was calculated according to the 2008 general CVD risk model from the Framingham Heart Study. Results: The HOMA-IR index was significantly correlated with the FRS, with a Pearson’s coefficient of 0.22. In the multiple logistic regression model, a higher HOMA-IR level was significantly associated with a high FRS (FRS ≥ 20%) (highest tertile vs. lowest tertile of HOMA-IR, crude OR = 3.69; 95% CI = 1.79–7.62), even after adjusting for smoking, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) (highest tertile vs. lowest tertile of HOMA-IR, adjusted OR = 11.51; 95% CI = 2.55–51.94). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the HOMA-IR index as the predictor of high FRS was 0.627, and the optimal HOMA-IR cutoff value was 1.215 (sensitivity = 83.6%, specificity = 42.9%). Conclusions: We considered that HOMA-IR is an independent factor but that it cannot be used solely for evaluating the CVD risk due to the low AUC value. Further prospective cohort studies are warranted to better assess the relationship between CVD risk and insulin resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei-Chun Lu & Wei-Ching Fang & Wen-Cheng Li & Wei-Chung Yeh & Ying-Hua Shieh & Jau-Yuan Chen, 2020. "The Association between Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study among Taiwanese People Aged over 50 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7195-:d:422609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Won Ju Hwang & Mi Jeong Kim, 2022. "Toward Public Health Wellness: Psychosocial & Physical Health in the Community," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-4, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7195-:d:422609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.