IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7104-d420806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero

    (Psychosocial Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade da Coruña, Campus de A Coruña, 15071 A Coruna, Spain)

  • Michelle D Smith

    (School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia)

  • Alejandro Quintela-del-Rio

    (Psychosocial Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universidade de A Coruna, 15071 A Coruna, Spain)

  • Venerina Johnston

    (School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
    Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia)

Abstract

This study examines demographic, physical and psychosocial factors associated with an increase in low back pain (LBP) during a one-hour standing task. A cross-sectional survey with 40 office workers was conducted. The primary outcome was pain severity during a one-hour standing task recorded every 15 min using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants were defined as pain developers (PD), if they reported a change in pain of ≥10 mm from baseline, or non-pain developers (NPD). Physical outcomes included participant-rated and examiner-rated trunk and hip motor control and endurance. Self-report history of LBP, physical activity, psychosocial job characteristics, general health and pain catastrophising were collected. Fourteen participants were PD. Hip abduction, abdominal and spinal muscle endurance was lower for PD ( p ≤ 0.05). PD had greater self-reported difficulty performing active hip abduction and active straight leg raise tests ( p ≤ 0.04). Those reporting a lifetime, 12 month or 7-day history of LBP ( p < 0.05) and lower self-reported physical function ( p = 0.01) were more likely to develop LBP during the standing task. In conclusion, a history of LBP, reduced trunk and hip muscle endurance and deficits in lumbopelvic/hip motor control may be important to consider in office workers experiencing standing-induced LBP.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero & Michelle D Smith & Alejandro Quintela-del-Rio & Venerina Johnston, 2020. "What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7104-:d:420806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero & Michelle D. Smith & Sonia Pértega-Díaz & Alejandro Quintela-del-Rio & Venerina Johnston, 2022. "Thirty Minutes Identified as the Threshold for Development of Pain in Low Back and Feet Regions, and Predictors of Intensity of Pain during 1-h Laboratory-Based Standing in Office Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Yidan Dong & Xu Jin & Jingjing Wang & Nazhakaiti Maimaiti & Lihua He & Fujiang Wang & Xianning Jin & Shijuan Wang & Zhongbin Zhang & Mikael Forsman & Liyun Yang, 2021. "Study on the Associations of Individual and Work-Related Factors with Low Back Pain among Manufacturing Workers Based on Logistic Regression and Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7104-:d:420806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.