IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7089-d420674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment with MAGIC Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Elderly Primary Care Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Fátima Dios-Quiroga

    (Quality and Research Unit, Health Area of Vigo, Galician Health Service, RedIAPP, Group I-Saúde (Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur), CP 36201 Vigo, Spain)

  • Susana Soliño-Lourido

    (Lérez Health Center, Lugar Porta do Sol s/n, Health Area of Pontevedra, CP 36156 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Carmen Pallas-Queijo

    (Vigo Family and Community Medicine and Nursing Teaching Unit, Health Area of Vigo, Galician Health Service, RedIAPP, Group I-Saúde (Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur), CP 36201 Vigo, Spain)

  • Clara González-Formoso

    (Vigo Family and Community Medicine and Nursing Teaching Unit, Health Area of Vigo, Galician Health Service, RedIAPP, Group I-Saúde (Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur), CP 36201 Vigo, Spain)

  • Aurelia Constenla-Castro

    (Lérez Health Center, Lugar Porta do Sol s/n, Health Area of Pontevedra, CP 36156 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Soledad Conde-Freire

    (Val Miñor Health Center, Avenida Portugal, 91 (A Xunqueira)—A Ramallosa, Health Area of Vigo, CP 36379 Pontevedra, Spain)

  • Ana Clavería

    (Quality and Research Unit, Health Area of Vigo, Galician Health Service, RedIAPP, Group I-Saúde (Institute of Health Research Galicia Sur), CP 36201 Vigo, Spain)

Abstract

The Manageable Geriatric Assessment (MAGIC) questionnaire, recently developed by a group of European family doctors for multidimensional geriatric assessment in primary care, has not yet been evaluated in clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to translate and adapt it to Spanish and to check the association between the limitations of older adults identified by this questionnaire and their perceived health status assessed by the five-level version of the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L). First, questionnaire translation, back translation and cognitive test were applied. Then, a cross-sectional observational study was performed in two Spanish health centers Galicia, Spain. Participants were 170 people aged over 75, recruited opportunistically by consecutive case sampling. Anonymous surveys were used to collect data. The MAGIC questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5L scale, age and sex were employed. The visual analog scale of EQ-5D-5L (EQ VAS) was used as the outcome variable. Descriptive and bivariate analyses by sex and outcome variable are presented. The linear regression analysis showed an association with quality of life for daily activities, recognizing people and stress incontinence. As this is associated with quality of life, the MAGIC questionnaire may be useful in primary care and a study to investigate the impact on health with a clinical trial would be worth considering.

Suggested Citation

  • Fátima Dios-Quiroga & Susana Soliño-Lourido & Carmen Pallas-Queijo & Clara González-Formoso & Aurelia Constenla-Castro & Soledad Conde-Freire & Ana Clavería, 2020. "Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment with MAGIC Questionnaire and Quality of Life in Elderly Primary Care Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7089-:d:420674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sabina Baraković & Jasmina Baraković Husić & Joost van Hoof & Ondrej Krejcar & Petra Maresova & Zahid Akhtar & Francisco Jose Melero, 2020. "Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie N. Gaber & Louise Nygård & Anna Brorsson & Anders Kottorp & Georgina Charlesworth & Sarah Wallcook & Camilla Malinowsky, 2020. "Social Participation in Relation to Technology Use and Social Deprivation: A Mixed Methods Study Among Older People with and without Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Manuela PANAITESCU, 2020. "Galati – smart city? Desideratum or reality," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 91-101, November.
    3. Joost van Hoof & Hannah R. Marston, 2021. "Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Sonja Pedell & Ann Borda & Alen Keirnan & Nicole Aimers, 2021. "Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Klaudia Przybysz & Agnieszka Stanimir, 2023. "How Active Are European Seniors—Their Personal Ways to Active Ageing? Is Seniors’ Activity in Line with the Expectations of the Active Ageing Strategy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Jeroen Dikken & Rudy F.M. van den Hoven & Willeke H. van Staalduinen & Loes M.T. Hulsebosch-Janssen & Joost van Hoof, 2020. "How Older People Experience the Age-Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Weck, Marina & Afanassieva, Marianne, 2023. "Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: Factors affecting older people's initial trust formation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2).
    8. Jasmina Barakovic Husic & Francisco José Melero & Sabina Barakovic & Petre Lameski & Eftim Zdravevski & Petra Maresova & Ondrej Krejcar & Ivan Chorbev & Nuno M. Garcia & Vladimir Trajkovik, 2020. "Aging at Work: A Review of Recent Trends and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Mary Chidiac & Christopher Ross & Hannah R. Marston & Shannon Freeman, 2022. "Age and Gender Perspectives on Social Media and Technology Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7089-:d:420674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.