IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6807-d415478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smokers’ and Young Adult Non-Smokers’ Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia A. Wackowski

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Mariam Rashid

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Kathryn L. Greene

    (Department of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • M. Jane Lewis

    (Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Richard J. O’Connor

    (Department of Health Behavior, Rowell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

Abstract

Although no tobacco products are safe, tobacco companies in the United States may request regulatory authorization to make certain “modified risk tobacco product” (MRTP) claims in their marketing. However, few qualitative studies have explored consumer perceptions and understanding of comparative risk messages and wordings. We examined consumer perceptions of statements indicating reduced risks and exposure to chemicals from snus and e-cigarettes relative to smoking. We conducted 12 focus groups with adult smokers (ages 21–66) and young adult (YA) non-smokers (ages 18–25) ( n = 57) in the USA in 2019. Participants shared reactions to modified risk and exposure messages and message variations. Participants largely understood claims, including language about “switching completely.” However, participants expressed desire for more message specificity, evidence, risk reduction reasons, and statistics/quantitative information. Claim believability and acceptance was also limited by existing negative product beliefs and experiences, negative media reports, and skepticism about message source. YAs did not express product interest based on message exposure. Some YAs suggested the included “smoker” language made the messages less interesting/relevant. Given existing proposals for and use of MRTP messages, additional research on their wording, framing, delivery, and effects may help inform regulatory or organizational decisions about such messages, optimize potential benefits, and mitigate unintended consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia A. Wackowski & Mariam Rashid & Kathryn L. Greene & M. Jane Lewis & Richard J. O’Connor, 2020. "Smokers’ and Young Adult Non-Smokers’ Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6807-:d:415478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bo Yang & Juliana L. Barbati & Yunjin Choi, 2021. "Will E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages with a Nicotine Warning Polarize Smokers’ Beliefs about the Efficacy of Switching Completely to E-Cigarettes in Reducing Smoking-Related Risks?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Teresa DeAtley & Andrea C. Johnson & Matthew D. Stone & Janet Audrain-McGovern & Melissa Mercincavage & Andrew A. Strasser, 2023. "Effects of Modified Tobacco Risk Products with Claims and Nicotine Features on Perceptions among Racial and Ethnic Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6807-:d:415478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.