IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6620-d412183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Infection Risks among Clients and Staff Who Use Tattooing Services in Poland: An Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska

    (Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Kazimierza Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
    National Institute of Public Health, Chocimska 24, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Izabela Kucharska

    (Chief Sanitary Inspectorate, Targowa 65, 03-729 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Segiet-Swiecicka

    (Faculty and Department of Experimental Physiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marcin Kuczerowski

    (Hospital Praski, Aleja Solidarności 67, 03-401 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Robert Gajda

    (Gajda-Med Medical Center, ul. Piotra Skargi 23/29, 06-100 Pułtusk, Poland)

Abstract

Across cultures and generations, people have tattooed their bodies. Although blood-borne infections from tattooing have been reduced, certain service aspects remain improperly managed. We assessed the infection risks associated with tattooing by conducting a cross-sectional study (2013–2014) in Poland using an anonymous questionnaire survey. Scoring procedures for blood-borne infection risks for tattooists and their clients were used. Overall, 255 tattooists were interviewed. A quasi-random selection of tattoo parlors was based on a service register. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior regarding blood-borne infection risks were assessed using a questionnaire. Simultaneously, tattoo centers were audited. Tattooing had a higher infection risk for tattooists than for clients. Approximately 50% of respondents underwent training on postexposure procedures, which constituted almost one in five of the reported needlestick/cut injuries sustained while working. Furthermore, 25.8% had no knowledge regarding risk from reliable sources, and 2.1% had not broadened their knowledge. Tattooists and their clients are at a risk of infection, and knowledge concerning infection risks remains an underestimated preventative factor. Service quality surveillance and creation of a register for tattoo-related complications may help assess the scale of this public health issue. However, a lack of these records implies the challenges in developing effective organizational and legal protections.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita Gębska-Kuczerowska & Izabela Kucharska & Agnieszka Segiet-Swiecicka & Marcin Kuczerowski & Robert Gajda, 2020. "Assessing Infection Risks among Clients and Staff Who Use Tattooing Services in Poland: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6620-:d:412183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmela Protano & Federica Valeriani & Daniela Marotta & Annalisa Bargellini & Aida Bianco & Giuseppina Caggiano & Maria Eugenia Colucci & Maria Anna Coniglio & Laura Dallolio & Osvalda De Giglio & Ga, 2021. "Assessing Undergraduates’ Perception of Risks Related to Body Art in Italy: The SUPeRBA Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6620-:d:412183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.