Author
Listed:
- Sandra Köhne
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Ulrich Schweiger
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Gitta A. Jacob
(GAIA AG Hamburg, 22085 Hamburg, Germany)
- Diana Braakmann
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Jan Philipp Klein
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Stefan Borgwardt
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Nele Assmann
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Mirco Rogg
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Anja Schaich
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
- Eva Faßbinder
(Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany)
Abstract
eHealth programs have been found to be effective in treating many psychological conditions. Regarding Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), few programs have been tested; nevertheless, results are promising. The therapeutic alliance is an important factor predicting treatment outcome in BPD. However, we do not know yet to what extent BPD patients form a therapeutic alliance with an eHealth tool and how this relationship differs from the relationship with their human therapist. This study aims to address this question using priovi, an interactive schema therapy-based eHealth tool for BPD. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore how patients perceived the therapeutic alliance with priovi and its differences compared to the alliance with their human therapist (N = 9). Interview data were analyzed following the procedures of qualitative content analysis. Additionally, the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SR) was administered in two versions (regarding the human therapist and priovi, N = 16) every three months during the treatment phase of one year. Results indicate that patients were able to form a good therapeutic relationship with priovi, but it differed from the relationship to their human therapist. Important categories were “priovi is helpful, supportive and always there” and “priovi is less flexible”. WAI ratings for the task subscale were high in both relationships but significantly higher in WAI therapist compared to WAI priovi in two measurements (nine-months measurement: t = 2.76, df = 15, p = 0.015; twelve-months measurement: t = 3.44, df = 15, p = 0.004). These results indicate that BPD patients can form a functioning alliance with an eHealth program and that eHealth programs may be especially useful for psychoeducation and cognitive exercises.
Suggested Citation
Sandra Köhne & Ulrich Schweiger & Gitta A. Jacob & Diana Braakmann & Jan Philipp Klein & Stefan Borgwardt & Nele Assmann & Mirco Rogg & Anja Schaich & Eva Faßbinder, 2020.
"Therapeutic Relationship in eHealth—A Pilot Study of Similarities and Differences between the Online Program Priovi and Therapists Treating Borderline Personality Disorder,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6436-:d:408653
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6436-:d:408653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.