IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6352-d406768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Exhaustion at the Respiratory Compensation Point in Recreational Cyclists

Author

Listed:
  • Susana Moral-González

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier González-Sánchez

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pedro L. Valenzuela

    (Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sonia García-Merino

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Barbado

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alejandro Lucia

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carl Foster

    (Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA)

  • David Barranco-Gil

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The time to exhaustion (t lim ) at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) and whether a physiological steady state is observed at this workload remains unknown. Thus, this study analyzed t lim at the power output eliciting the RCP (t lim at RCP), the oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) response to this effort, and the influence of endurance fitness. Sixty male recreational cyclists (peak oxygen uptake [VO 2peak ] 40–60 mL∙kg∙min −1 ) performed an incremental test to determine the RCP, VO 2peak , and maximal aerobic power (MAP). They also performed constant-load tests to determine the t lim at RCP and t lim at MAP. Participants were divided based on their VO 2peak into a low-performance group (LP, n = 30) and a high-performance group (HP, n = 30). The t lim at RCP averaged 20 min 32 s ± 5 min 42 s, with a high between-subject variability (coefficient of variation 28%) but with no differences between groups ( p = 0.788, effect size = 0.06). No consistent relationships were found between the t lim at RCP and the different fitness markers analyzed (RCP, power output (PO) at RCP, VO 2peak , MAP, or t lim at MAP; all p > 0.05). VO 2 remained steady overall during the t lim test, although a VO 2 slow component (i.e., an increase in VO 2 >200 mL·min −1 from the third min to the end of the tests) was present in 33% and 40% of the participants in HP and LP, respectively. In summary, the PO at RCP could be maintained for about 20 min. However, there was a high between-subject variability in both the t lim and in the VO 2 response to this effort that seemed to be independent of fitness level, which raises concerns on the suitability of this test for fitness assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Susana Moral-González & Javier González-Sánchez & Pedro L. Valenzuela & Sonia García-Merino & Carlos Barbado & Alejandro Lucia & Carl Foster & David Barranco-Gil, 2020. "Time to Exhaustion at the Respiratory Compensation Point in Recreational Cyclists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6352-:d:406768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Javier Iglesias-Pino & Alba Herrero-Molleda & Jaime Fernández-Fernández & Juan García-López, 2022. "Interchangeability between the Data Obtained by Two Powermeters during Road Cycling Competitions: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-6, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6352-:d:406768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.