IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6244-d405137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Safety Risks of Civil Engineering Laboratories Based on Lab Criticity Index: A Case Study in Jiangsu Province

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Zhang

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Peng Mao

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Hongyang Li

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)

  • Yuxin Xu

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Dan You

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Hui Liu

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wei Huang

    (School of Civil Engineering, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China)

  • Jingfeng Yuan

    (Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the construction industry, an increasing amount of attention were paid by universities to the development of civil engineering experiment courses so as to improve the practical research abilities of students. In recent years, due to the frequent occurrence of civil engineering laboratory accidents, it has become an urgent issue regarding on what factors influencing safety risks and how to assess and reduce the safety risks in civil engineering laboratories. Based on the lab criticity index (LCI) model, the research specificities of civil engineering laboratories were analyzed through literature review and expert interviews and 13 risk factors of civil engineering laboratories, from the four aspects of man, object, management, and environment, identified. The data for each parameter in the LCI model was obtained through a questionnaire survey, and finally the LCI value was calculated to evaluate priority. Among them, insufficient safety awareness of operators, danger due to equipment failure, imperfect management policies, and complex floor conditions were listed as the most common risk factors. Based on the LCI model, the worsening factors of these four risk factors were further analyzed. The LCI model is applied to the new research field of safety risk assessment in civil engineering laboratories that few researchers have studied before and a risk list for civil engineering laboratories was created. We revealed the safety status of civil engineering laboratories in Jiangsu Province and provided feasible suggestions for improving the management and supervision of civil engineering laboratories at universities. It can strengthen operator awareness of the risks in civil engineering laboratories and improve the social group’s attention to the safety risks of the laboratories, thus reducing the accidents’ possibility and seriousness of civil engineering laboratories.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Zhang & Peng Mao & Hongyang Li & Yuxin Xu & Dan You & Hui Liu & Wei Huang & Jingfeng Yuan, 2020. "Assessing the Safety Risks of Civil Engineering Laboratories Based on Lab Criticity Index: A Case Study in Jiangsu Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6244-:d:405137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amela Groso & Aristide Ouedraogo & Thierry Meyer, 2012. "Risk analysis in research environment," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 187-208, February.
    2. Braumann, Evelyn C. & Grabner, Isabella & Posch, Arthur, 2020. "Tone from the top in risk management: A complementarity perspective on how control systems influence risk awareness," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Xiaodan Zheng & Shuibo Zhang & Conghan Wang, 2018. "Trust Repair after Opportunistic Behaviors in the Chinese Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Richard Van Noorden, 2013. "Safety survey reveals lab risks," Nature, Nature, vol. 493(7430), pages 9-10, January.
    5. Braumann, Evelyn & Grabner, Isabella & Posch, Arthur, 2020. "Tone from the Top in Risk Management: A Complementarity Perspective on How Control Systems Influence Risk Awareness," Department for Strategy and Innovation Working Paper Series 03/2020, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Bürgel, Tobias R. & Hiebl, Martin R.W. & Pielsticker, David I., 2023. "Digitalization and entrepreneurial firms' resilience to pandemic crises: Evidence from COVID-19 and the German Mittelstand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    3. Christoph Feichter & Isabella Grabner, 2020. "Empirische Forschung zu Management Control – Ein Überblick und neue Trends [Empirical Management Control Reserach—An Overview and Future Directions]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 149-181, June.
    4. Jacobo Gomez‐Conde & Ernesto Lopez‐Valeiras & Ricardo Malagueño & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2022. "Quality of performance metrics, informal peer monitoring and goal commitment," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 4041-4077, September.
    5. Adrian-Cosmin Caraiman, 2020. "Responsibility for Internal Control in Corporate Governance," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 612-618, December.
    6. Marta Pérez Sigüenza & Laura Rodríguez-León Rodríguez & Juan Manuel Ramon Jeronimo & Raquel Flórez López, 2022. "Management Control Systems and International Entrepreneurship in Small, Young Firms from Resource-Based Theory, Contingence, and Effectuation Approach Perspectives," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Ashish Varma & Adnan Khan, 2023. "Simons levers of control disentangled: A quasi-experiment into the competitiveness of hybrid firms," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 19-41.
    8. Galasso, Alberto & Luo, Hong & Zhu, Brooklynn, 2023. "Laboratory safety and research productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    9. Sharifzadeh, Mahdi & Meghdari, Mojtaba & Rashtchian, Davood, 2017. "Multi-objective design and operation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) Triple Combined-cycle Power Generation systems: Integrating energy efficiency and operational safety," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 345-361.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6244-:d:405137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.