Author
Listed:
- Corrado Giua
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy)
- Paola Minghetti
(Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133 Milan, Italy)
- Giorgio Gandolini
(Centro Reumatologia, IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente, Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS, 20148 Milano, Italy)
- Paolo Rocco
(Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133 Milan, Italy)
- Elisa Arancio
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy)
- Teresa Bevacqua
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy)
- Nicolina Floris
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy)
- Enrico Keber
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy)
- SGCP
(Società Italiana Farmacia Clinica (SIFAC), Viale Regina Margherita 30, 09126 Cagliari, Italy
SIFAC Group of Clinical Community Pharmacists: Andrea Incorvaia, Massimo Mirabella, Maria D’Isidoro, Michele Favero, Clara Saba, Margherita Saddì, Sonia Via, Sofia Bonati, Salvatore Marini, and Sara Montesano.)
- Umberto M. Musazzi
(Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Colombo 71, 20133 Milan, Italy)
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most frequent diseases for which patients seek advice in a community pharmacy. The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the administration by community pharmacists of questionnaires to assess the LBP intensity and disability degree in patients entering community pharmacies and the attitudes they have toward pain management by pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. Methods: An explorative, cross-sectional, observational, and quantitative study was performed. Twelve Italian community pharmacists were asked to submit a questionnaire on LBP to patients visiting their pharmacies. The questionnaire included a pain intensity scale, and two validated tools: the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Start Back Screening Tool (SBST) to determine the degree and risk of patient disability, respectively. Results: 872 patients filled out the questionnaires in 6 months. No statistical differences between genders ( p > 0.30) were recorded for pain intensity (Female: median score 6, IQR 4–7; Male: median scores 5, IQR 4–7; p > 0.30) and disability associated with LBP (RMDQ high-disability level: Females, 14.7%, Males, 15.0%; p > 0.90). Most of the patients (69%) reported a low degree of disability, but the risk of disability was medium and high in 36% and 18% of them, respectively ( p < 0.05). About 14% of patients declare to never seek for physician’s advice despite their medium-high degree of disability. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the feasibility of validated tools for assessing the degree and risk of disability in LBP patients administrable in community pharmacies. Moreover, the community pharmacy resulted in an important care portal for patients suffering from moderate LBP and for intercepting patients who suffered from severe LBP but had never reported their problem to their physician.
Suggested Citation
Corrado Giua & Paola Minghetti & Giorgio Gandolini & Paolo Rocco & Elisa Arancio & Teresa Bevacqua & Nicolina Floris & Enrico Keber & SGCP & Umberto M. Musazzi, 2020.
"Community Pharmacist’s Role in Detecting Low Back Pain, and Patient Attitudes—A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in Italian Community Pharmacies,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-13, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5965-:d:400095
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5965-:d:400095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.