Author
Listed:
- Hui-Hua Chen
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan)
- Wan-Hua Ting
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan)
- Hsu-Dong Sun
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan)
- Ming-Chow Wei
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan)
- Ho-Hsiung Lin
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and the Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan)
- Sheng-Mou Hsiao
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Banqiao, New Taipei 220409, Taiwan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and the Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan
Graduate School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan)
Abstract
Background: to elucidate the predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk endometrial cancer patients. Methods: the medical records of all consecutivewomen with high-risk endometrial cancer were reviewed. Results: among 92 high-risk endometrial cancer patients, 30 women experienced recurrence, and 21 women died. The 5-year PFS and OS probabilities were 65.3% and 75.9%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression revealed that body mass index (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.11), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (HR = 11.11), lymphovascular space invasion (HR = 5.61), and sandwich chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.15) were independently predictors of PFS. Body mass index (HR = 1.31), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (HR = 32.74), non-endometrioid cell type (HR = 11.31), and sandwich chemoradiotherapy (HR = 0.07) were independently predictors of OS. Among 51 women who underwent sandwich ( n = 35) or concurrent ( n = 16) chemoradiotherapy, the use of sandwich chemoradiotherapy were associated with better PFS (adjusted HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.08–0.87, p = 0.03) and OS (adjusted HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02–0.71, p = 0.02) compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Conclusion: compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sandwich chemoradiotherapy was associated with better PFS and OS in high-risk endometrial cancer patients. In addition, high body mass index, paraaortic lymph node metastasis, and non-endometrioid cell type were also predictors of poor OS in high-risk endometrial cancer patients.
Suggested Citation
Hui-Hua Chen & Wan-Hua Ting & Hsu-Dong Sun & Ming-Chow Wei & Ho-Hsiung Lin & Sheng-Mou Hsiao, 2020.
"Predictors of Survival in Women with High-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Comparisons of Sandwich versus Concurrent Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-15, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5941-:d:399636
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5941-:d:399636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.