IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5772-d396837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profiles on the Orientation Discrimination Processing of Human Faces

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Moret-Tatay

    (Escuela de Doctorado, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, San Agustín 3, 46002 València, Spain)

  • Inmaculada Baixauli-Fortea

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Sede Padre Jofré, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain)

  • M. Dolores Grau-Sevilla

    (Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Sede Padre Jofré, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain)

Abstract

Face recognition is a crucial subject for public health, as socialization is one of the main characteristics for full citizenship. However, good recognizers would be distinguished, not only by the number of faces they discriminate but also by the number of rejected stimuli as unfamiliar. When it comes to face recognition, it is important to remember that position, to some extent, would not entail a high cognitive cost, unlike other processes in similar areas of the brain. The aim of this paper was to examine participant’s recognition profiles according to face position. For this reason, a recognition task was carried out by employing the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces. Reaction times and accuracy were employed as dependent variables and a cluster analysis was carried out. A total of two profiles were identified in participants’ performance, which differ in position in terms of reaction times but not accuracy. The results can be described as follows: first, it is possible to identify performance profiles in visual recognition of faces that differ in position in terms of reaction times, not accuracy; secondly, results suggest a bias towards the left. At the applied level, this could be of interest with a view to conducting training programs in face recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Moret-Tatay & Inmaculada Baixauli-Fortea & M. Dolores Grau-Sevilla, 2020. "Profiles on the Orientation Discrimination Processing of Human Faces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-11, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5772-:d:396837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Moret-Tatay & Inmaculada Baixauli-Fortea & M. Dolores Grau Sevilla & Tatiana Quarti Irigaray, 2020. "Can You Identify These Celebrities? A Network Analysis on Differences between Word and Face Recognition," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Regina Nuzzo, 2014. "Scientific method: Statistical errors," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 150-152, February.
    3. Naomi R Smart & Claire J Horwell & Trevor S Smart & Karen S Galea, 2020. "Assessment of the Wearability of Facemasks against Air Pollution in Primary School-Aged Children in London," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Daniel Norton & Ryan McBain & Yue Chen, 2009. "Reduced Ability to Detect Facial Configuration in Middle-Aged and Elderly Individuals: Associations With Spatiotemporal Visual Processing," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(3), pages 328-334.
    5. Sheba Selvam & Ramadoss Balakrishnan & Balasundaram Sadhu Ramakrishnan, 2018. "Ontology With Hybrid Clustering Approach for Improving the Retrieval Relevancy in Social Event Detection," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 14(4), pages 33-56, October.
    6. Zonglei Zhen & Huizhen Fang & Jia Liu, 2013. "The Hierarchical Brain Network for Face Recognition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyotirmoy Sarkar, 2018. "Will P†Value Triumph over Abuses and Attacks?," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(4), pages 66-71, July.
    2. Kevin Lanza & Casey P. Durand & Melody Alcazar & Sierra Ehlers & Kai Zhang & Harold W. Kohl, 2021. "School Parks as a Community Health Resource: Use of Joint-Use Parks by Children before and during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Gunnarsson, Björn Rafn & vanden Broucke, Seppe & Baesens, Bart & Óskarsdóttir, María & Lemahieu, Wilfried, 2021. "Deep learning for credit scoring: Do or don’t?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 292-305.
    4. Arthur Matsuo Yamashita Rios de Sousa & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu, 2017. "Detection of statistical asymmetries in non-stationary sign time series: Analysis of foreign exchange data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Andrew Gelman & Christian Hennig, 2017. "Beyond subjective and objective in statistics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(4), pages 967-1033, October.
    7. Kai Kisielinski & Paul Giboni & Andreas Prescher & Bernd Klosterhalfen & David Graessel & Stefan Funken & Oliver Kempski & Oliver Hirsch, 2021. "Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-42, April.
    8. Felipe Campelo & Fernanda Takahashi, 2019. "Sample size estimation for power and accuracy in the experimental comparison of algorithms," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 305-338, April.
    9. Martin E Héroux & Janet L Taylor & Simon C Gandevia, 2015. "The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Jennifer L. Scheid & Shannon P. Lupien & Gregory S. Ford & Sarah L. West, 2020. "Commentary: Physiological and Psychological Impact of Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    11. Roger Beecham & Nick Williams & Alexis Comber, 2020. "Regionally-structured explanations behind area-level populism: An update to recent ecological analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    12. Tagiew, Rustam & Ignatov, Dmitry, 2016. "Gift Ratios in Laboratory Experiments," MPRA Paper 77603, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Megan L Head & Luke Holman & Rob Lanfear & Andrew T Kahn & Michael D Jennions, 2015. "The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, 2015. "Overcoming Learning Aversion in Evaluating and Managing Uncertain Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(10), pages 1892-1910, October.
    15. Bettina Budeus & Jörg Timm & Daniel Hoffmann, 2016. "SeqFeatR for the Discovery of Feature-Sequence Associations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Stefano Anzellotti & Alfonso Caramazza & Rebecca Saxe, 2017. "Multivariate pattern dependence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Shuxin Guo & Qiang Liu, 2024. "Data-generating process and time-series asset pricing," Papers 2405.10920, arXiv.org.
    18. Luo, Xing & Zhang, Dongxiao & Zhu, Xu, 2022. "Combining transfer learning and constrained long short-term memory for power generation forecasting of newly-constructed photovoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1062-1077.
    19. Chengwu Yang & Carlo Panlilio & Nicole Verdiglione & Erik B Lehman & Robert M Hamm & Richard Fiene & Sarah Dore & David E Bard & Breanna Grable & Benjamin Levi, 2020. "Generalizing findings from a randomized controlled trial to a real-world study of the iLookOut, an online education program to improve early childhood care and education providers’ knowledge and attit," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, January.
    20. Micha³ Zdziarski & Dominika Czerniawska, 2016. "Board Homophily, Board Diversity and Network Centrality (Homofilia, zroznicowanie i centralnosc rady w sieci)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(60), pages 117-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5772-:d:396837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.