IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5565-d393277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Individual or Group Physiotherapy in the Management of Sub-Acromial Impingement: A Randomised Controlled Trial and Health Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Ryans

    (General Practice Elective Care Service (MSK), Eastern GP Federations, Belfast, BT8 7AR, Ireland)

  • Rhona Galway

    (Rheumatology Department, South Eastern Health and Social Services Trust, Dundonald BT16 1RH, Ireland)

  • Annette Harte

    (School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast BT37 0QB, Ireland)

  • Rejina Verghis

    (Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast BT12 6BA, Ireland)

  • Ashley Agus

    (Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit, Belfast BT12 6BA, Ireland)

  • Neil Heron

    (Department of General Practice, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
    Department of Primary Care, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK)

  • Roland McKane

    (Rheumatology Department, South Eastern Health and Social Services Trust, Dundonald BT16 1RH, Ireland)

Abstract

Background : Shoulder pain is common in primary care. The management of subacromial impingement (SAI) can include corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy. Physiotherapy can be on an individual or group basis. Aim : To examine the clinical effectiveness and make an economic analysis of individual versus group physiotherapy, following corticosteroid injection for SAI. Design and Setting : A single-blind, open-label, randomised equivalence study comparing group and individual physiotherapy. Patients referred by local general practitioners and physiotherapists were considered for inclusion. Method : Patients were randomised to individual or group physiotherapy groups, and all received corticosteroid injection before physiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) at 26 weeks. An economic analysis was conducted. Results and Conclusion : 136 patients were recruited, 68 randomised to each group. Recruitment was 68% of the target 200 participants. SPADI (from baseline to 26 weeks) demonstrated a difference (SE) in mean change between groups of −0.43 (5.7) ( p -value = 0.050001), and the TOST (two-one-sided test for equivalence) 90% CI for this difference was (−10.0 to 9.14). This was borderline. In a secondary analysis using inputted data, patients without SPADI at week 26 were analysed by carrying forward scores at week 12 (mean difference (95% CI) = −0.14 (−7.5 to 7.3), p -value = 0.014). There is little difference in outcome at 26 weeks. Group physiotherapy was cheaper to deliver per patient (£252 versus £84). Group physiotherapy for SAI produces similar clinical outcomes to individual physiotherapy with potential cost savings. Due to low recruitment to our study, firm conclusions are difficult and further research is required to give a definitive answer to this research question. (NCT Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT04058522).

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Ryans & Rhona Galway & Annette Harte & Rejina Verghis & Ashley Agus & Neil Heron & Roland McKane, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Individual or Group Physiotherapy in the Management of Sub-Acromial Impingement: A Randomised Controlled Trial and Health Economic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5565-:d:393277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5565-:d:393277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.