IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5401-d390492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Implementation and Effectiveness of the SWITCH–MS: An Ecological, Multi-Component Adolescent Obesity Prevention Intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Senlin Chen

    (School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA)

  • Richard R. Rosenkranz

    (Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics, & Health, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Gabriella M. McLoughlin

    (College of Human Sciences and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Spyridoula Vazou

    (College of Human Sciences and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Lorraine Lanningham-Foster

    (College of Human Sciences and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Douglas A. Gentile

    (College of Human Sciences and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • David A. Dzewaltowski

    (University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 69198, USA)

Abstract

Background : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of an ecological, multi-component adolescent obesity prevention intervention called School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health–Middle School (SWITCH–MS). Methods : Following the effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 3 quasi-experimental design, seven middle schools (377 students) in Iowa, United States, were stratified into “experienced” ( n = 3; 110 students) or “inexperienced” ( n = 4; 267 students) groups to receive the 12-week SWITCH–MS intervention. To evaluate implementation, school informants ( n = 10) responded to a survey and students completed behavioral tracking in the classroom on a website. For effectiveness evaluation, students in 6th, 7th, and 8th grades completed a validated questionnaire before and after intervention, to measure behaviors of physical activity (PA; “Do”), screen-based activity (“View”), and fruits and vegetable consumption (“Chew”). Results : The two groups of schools showed similar levels of implementation for best practices, awareness, and engagement. Behavioral tracking rate favored the experienced schools early on (47.5% vs. 11.7%), but differences leveled off in weeks 3–12 (sustained at 30.1–44.3%). Linear mixed models demonstrated significant time effects for “Do” (at school and out of school; p < 0.01) and “View” behaviors ( p = 0.02), after controlling for student- and school-level covariates. Conclusions : This study demonstrates that prior experience with SWITCH–MS may not be a prominent factor for implementation and effectiveness, although greater experience is associated with favorable behavioral tracking when the intervention is first launched.

Suggested Citation

  • Senlin Chen & Richard R. Rosenkranz & Gabriella M. McLoughlin & Spyridoula Vazou & Lorraine Lanningham-Foster & Douglas A. Gentile & David A. Dzewaltowski, 2020. "Evaluating the Implementation and Effectiveness of the SWITCH–MS: An Ecological, Multi-Component Adolescent Obesity Prevention Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5401-:d:390492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella M. McLoughlin & Richard R. Rosenkranz & Joey A. Lee & Maren M. Wolff & Senlin Chen & David A. Dzewaltowski & Spyridoula Vazou & Lorraine Lanningham-Foster & Douglas A. Gentile & Marisa S. Ro, 2019. "The Importance of Self-Monitoring for Behavior Change in Youth: Findings from the SWITCH ® School Wellness Feasibility Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5401-:d:390492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.