IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5325-d389054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Utility of Virtual Patient Simulations for Clinical Reasoning Education

Author

Listed:
  • Takashi Watari

    (Postgraduate Clinical Training Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89–1, Enya-cho, Izumo shi Shimane 693-8501, Japan)

  • Yasuharu Tokuda

    (Okinawa Muribushi Project for Teaching Hospitals, Okinawa 901-2132, Japan)

  • Meiko Owada

    (Nursing Department, Toho University Hospital Omori Medical Center, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan)

  • Kazumichi Onigata

    (Postgraduate Clinical Training Center, Shimane University Hospital, 89–1, Enya-cho, Izumo shi Shimane 693-8501, Japan)

Abstract

Virtual Patient Simulations (VPSs) have been cited as a novel learning strategy, but there is little evidence that VPSs yield improvements in clinical reasoning skills and medical knowledge. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of VPSs for improving clinical reasoning skills among medical students, and to compare improvements in knowledge or clinical reasoning skills relevant to specific clinical scenarios. We enrolled 210 fourth-year medical students in March 2017 and March 2018 to participate in a real-time pre-post experimental design conducted in a large lecture hall by using a clicker. A VPS program ( ® Body Interact, Portugal) was implemented for one two-hour class session using the same methodology during both years. A pre–post 20-item multiple-choice questionnaire (10 knowledge and 10 clinical reasoning items) was used to evaluate learning outcomes. A total of 169 students completed the program. Participants showed significant increases in average total post-test scores, both on knowledge items (pre-test: median = 5, mean = 4.78, 95% CI (4.55–5.01); post-test: median = 5, mean = 5.12, 95% CI (4.90–5.43); p -value = 0.003) and clinical reasoning items (pre-test: median = 5, mean = 5.3 95%, CI (4.98–5.58); post-test: median = 8, mean = 7.81, 95% CI (7.57–8.05); p -value < 0.001). Thus, VPS programs could help medical students improve their clinical decision-making skills without lecturer supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Takashi Watari & Yasuharu Tokuda & Meiko Owada & Kazumichi Onigata, 2020. "The Utility of Virtual Patient Simulations for Clinical Reasoning Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5325-:d:389054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5325/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5325/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soomin Hong & JuHee Lee & Yeonsoo Jang & Yoonju Lee, 2021. "A Cross-Sectional Study: What Contributes to Nursing Students’ Clinical Reasoning Competence?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Anja Mayer & Vital Da Silva Domingues & Inga Hege & Andrzej A. Kononowicz & Marcos Larrosa & Begoña Martínez-Jarreta & Daloha Rodriguez-Molina & Bernardo Sousa-Pinto & Małgorzata Sudacka & Luc Morin, 2022. "Planning a Collection of Virtual Patients to Train Clinical Reasoning: A Blueprint Representative of the European Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5325-:d:389054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.