IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p4927-d382090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colonoscopy Screening Behaviour and Associated Factors Amongst First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China: Testing the Health Belief Model Using a Cross-Sectional Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Bai

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Cho Lee Wong

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Xiaolin Peng

    (Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Shenzhen 518054, China)

  • Winnie K. W. So

    (The Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Colonoscopy is the best screening choice for at-risk persons, because it offers prevention through the removal of preneoplastic lesions in addition to early detection. This study aims to report the participation rate of colonoscopy screening and examine its associated factors amongst Chinese first-degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer based on the health belief model (HBM). A cross-sectional study was conducted in Shenzhen, China from March to May 2019. Demographic characteristics, family history, variables derived from the HBM and colonoscopy screening behaviours were measured through online surveys as the independent variables of interest. A total of 186 online surveys were returned, with a final response rate of 57.0%. The participation rate of colonoscopy was 15.6%. Univariate analysis (independent t -test/chi-square test/Fisher test) was applied first to identify the candidate independent variables. Then, multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between independent variables and uptake of colonoscopy. Perceived barriers and cues to action were identified as factors associated with undergoing colonoscopy. The participation rate of colonoscopy in the study population was low. Health communication to promote colonoscopy screening for the Chinese at-risk population should include components in reducing barriers to colonoscopy tests, family history information and health professional recommendations on screening. Future studies with large sample size are suggested to examine perceived susceptibility, fatalism and other characteristics considering family history (treatment and outcome of patients) and their potential impacts on cancer screening behaviours for Chinese at-risk populations due to family history.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Bai & Cho Lee Wong & Xiaolin Peng & Winnie K. W. So, 2020. "Colonoscopy Screening Behaviour and Associated Factors Amongst First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China: Testing the Health Belief Model Using a Cross-Sectional Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4927-:d:382090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doris Y. P. Leung & Ka Ming Chow & Sally W. S. Lo & Winnie K. W. So & Carmen W. H. Chan, 2016. "Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenshuang Wei & Miao Zhang & Dan Zuo & Qinmei Li & Min Zhang & Xinguang Chen & Bin Yu & Qing Liu, 2022. "Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alicia Brotons & Mercedes Guilabert & Francisco Javier Lacueva & José Joaquín Mira & Blanca Lumbreras & María Dolores Picó & Julián Vitaller & Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre & Germán Belda & Javier Sola-V, 2019. "The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Doris Y. P. Leung & Joanne M. T. Chen & Vivian W. Q. Lou & Eliza M. L. Wong & Aileen W. K. Chan & Winnie K. W. So & Carmen W. H. Chan, 2017. "Effects of Promotional Materials on Attitudes and Fear towards Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese Older Adults: An Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Florence M. F. Wong, 2021. "Factors Associated with Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice towards Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening among People Aged 50–75 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4927-:d:382090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.