IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4707-d378408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program

Author

Listed:
  • Kara P. Wiseman

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Lindsay Hauser

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Connie Clark

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Onyiyoza Odumosu

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Neely Dahl

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Jennifer Peregoy

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Christina W. Sheffield

    (Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Robert C. Klesges

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    Center for Addiction Prevention Research, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

  • Roger T. Anderson

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    Cancer Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA)

Abstract

Tobacco use after a cancer diagnosis can increase risk of disease recurrence, increase the likelihood of a second primary cancer, and negatively impact treatment efficacy. The implementation of system-wide comprehensive tobacco cessation in the oncology setting has historically been low, with over half of cancer clinicians reporting that they do not treat or provide a referral to cessation resources. This quality improvement study evaluated the procedures for assessing and documenting tobacco use among cancer survivors and referring current smokers to cessation resources at the University of Virginia Cancer Center. Process mapping revealed 20 gaps across two major domains: electronic health record (EHR), and personnel barriers. The top identified priority was inconsistent documentation of tobacco use status as it impacted several downstream gaps. Eleven of the 20 gaps were deemed a high priority, and all were addressed during the implementation of the resulting Tobacco Treatment Program. Prioritized gaps were addressed using a combination of provider training, modifications to clinical workflow, and EHR modifications. Since implementation of solutions, the number of unique survivors receiving cessation treatment has increased from 284 survivors receiving cessation support during Year 1 of the initiative to 487 in Year 3. The resulting Tobacco Treatment Program provides a systematic, personalized, and sustainable comprehensive cessation program that optimizes the multifaceted workflow of the Cancer Center and has the potential to reduce tobacco use in a population most in need of cessation support.

Suggested Citation

  • Kara P. Wiseman & Lindsay Hauser & Connie Clark & Onyiyoza Odumosu & Neely Dahl & Jennifer Peregoy & Christina W. Sheffield & Robert C. Klesges & Roger T. Anderson, 2020. "An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4707-:d:378408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4707/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4707/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4707-:d:378408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.