IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4696-d378209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Muscle Activation and Distribution during Four Test/Functional Tasks: A Comparison between Dry-Land and Aquatic Environments for Healthy Older and Young Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Ántonio Cuesta-Vargas

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Reseach Institute of Málaga, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
    School of Clinical Sciences of the Faculty of Health, The Queensland University of Technology, 4000 Brisbane, Australia)

  • Jaime Martín-Martín

    (Legal Medicine Area, Department of Human Anatomy, Legal Medicine and History of Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • David Pérez-Cruzado

    (Departmen of Occupational Therapy, Catholic University of Murcia, D 30109 Murcia, Spain)

  • Carlos L. Cano-Herrera

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Reseach Institute of Málaga, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Javier Güeita Rodríguez

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
    Research Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science, Rey Juan Carlos University (Hum&QRinHS), 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain)

  • Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza

    (Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), 08500 Vic, Spain)

  • Manuel González-Sánchez

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Reseach Institute of Málaga, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

Background: The use of rehabilitation protocols carried out in water has been progressively increasing due to the favorable physical properties of the water. Electromyography allows one to register muscle activity even under water. Aim: To compare muscle activity between two groups (healthy young adults (HYA) and healthy older adults (HOA)) in two different environments (dry land and aquatic) using surface electromyography during the execution of four different test/functional movements. Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study. HYA and HOA carried out four functional tasks (Step Up and Down, Sit TO Stand test, Gait Initiation and Turns During Gait) in two different environments (dry land and aquatic). Absolute and relative muscle activation was compared between each group and between each environment. In addition, the stability of the measured was calculated through a test-retest (ICC 2:1). Results: Within the same environment there were significant differences between young and older adults in three of the four functional tasks. In contrast, in the gait initiation, hardly any significant differences were found between the two groups analysed, except for the soleus and the anterior tibial. Measurement stability ranged from good to excellent. Conclusions: Level of the musculature involvement presents an entirely different distribution when the test/functional task is performed on dry land or in water. There are differences both in the relative activation of the musculature and in the distribution of the partition of the muscles comparing older and young adults within the same environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Ántonio Cuesta-Vargas & Jaime Martín-Martín & David Pérez-Cruzado & Carlos L. Cano-Herrera & Javier Güeita Rodríguez & Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza & Manuel González-Sánchez, 2020. "Muscle Activation and Distribution during Four Test/Functional Tasks: A Comparison between Dry-Land and Aquatic Environments for Healthy Older and Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4696-:d:378209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4696-:d:378209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.