IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i12p4486-d374824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Stoffenmanager and a New Exposure Model for Estimating Occupational Exposure to Styrene in the Fiberglass Reinforced Plastics Lamination Process

Author

Listed:
  • Seokwon Lee

    (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
    Samsung Health Research Institute, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Hwaseong 18448, Korea)

  • Sangjun Choi

    (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea)

  • Kyoungho Lee

    (Samsung Health Research Institute, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Hwaseong 18448, Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate occupational exposure models by comparing model estimations of Stoffenmanager, version 8.2, and exposure scores calculated using a new exposure model with personal exposure measurements for styrene used in the fiberglass-reinforced plastic (FRP) lamination processes in Korea. Using the collected exposure measurements ( n = 160) with detailed contextual information about the type of process, working conditions, local exhaust ventilation, respiratory protections, and task descriptions, we developed a new model algorithm to estimate the score for occupational exposures on situation level. We assumed that the source of exposure originates from the near field only (within the breathing zone of workers). The new model is designed as a simple formula of multiplying scores for job classification, exposure potential, engineering controls, chemical hazard, and exposure probability and then dividing the score for workplace size. The final score is log-transformed, ranging from 1 to 14, and the exposure category is divided into four ratings: no exposure (1), low (2), medium (3), and high (4) exposures. Using the contextual information, all the parameters and modifying factors are similarly entered into the two models through direct translation and coding processes with expert judgement, and the exposure estimations and scores using the two models are calculated for each situation. Overall bias and precision for Stoffenmanager are −1.00 ± 2.07 (50th) and −0.32 ± 2.32 (90th) for all situations ( n = 36), indicating that Stoffenmanager slightly underestimated styrene exposures. Pearson’s correlation coefficients are significantly high for Stoffenmanager ( r = 0.87) and the new model ( r = 0.88), and the correlation between the two models is significantly high ( r = 0.93) ( p < 0.01). Therefore, the model estimations using Stoffenmanager and the new model are significantly correlated with the styrene exposures in the FRP lamination process. Further studies are needed to validate and calibrate the models using a larger number of exposure measurements for various substances in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Seokwon Lee & Sangjun Choi & Kyoungho Lee, 2020. "Evaluation of Stoffenmanager and a New Exposure Model for Estimating Occupational Exposure to Styrene in the Fiberglass Reinforced Plastics Lamination Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4486-:d:374824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4486/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4486/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aduldatch Sailabaht & Fan Wang & John Cherrie, 2018. "Extension of the Advanced REACH Tool (ART) to Include Welding Fume Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Hahn & Jessica Meyer & Michael Roitzsch & Christiaan Delmaar & Wolfgang Koch & Janine Schwarz & Astrid Heiland & Thomas Schendel & Christian Jung & Urs Schlüter, 2021. "Modelling Exposure by Spraying Activities—Status and Future Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Spinazzè & Francesca Borghi & Davide Campagnolo & Sabrina Rovelli & Marta Keller & Giacomo Fanti & Andrea Cattaneo & Domenico Maria Cavallo, 2019. "How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models’ Reliability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-29, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4486-:d:374824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.