IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i12p4389-d373330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Barrese

    (INAIL, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene (DiMEILA), Area Industriale Papa Benedetto XVI, 88046 Lamezia Terme (CZ), Italy)

  • Giovanna Tranfo

    (INAIL, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene (DiMEILA) Via Di Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy)

  • Antonella Marramao

    (INAIL, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene (DiMEILA), Area Industriale Papa Benedetto XVI, 88046 Lamezia Terme (CZ), Italy)

  • Marialuisa Scarpelli

    (INAIL, Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene (DiMEILA), Area Industriale Papa Benedetto XVI, 88046 Lamezia Terme (CZ), Italy)

Abstract

Dermal exposure of workers to pesticides can be assessed using patches, placed on the workers’ clothes or used to wipe off the substance from the skin. Since there are no official indications of the materials to be used for patch sampling, a wide range of materials is suggested in the scientific literature. This paper reports a laboratory study on the affinity of four different pesticides widely used in southern Italy with five patch matrices. Imidacloprid, Hexythiazox, Boscalid and Myclobutanil were tested with cotton and gauze sheets, polyethylene tissue and two different grades of cellulose papers. An aerosol machine was used to nebulize the substance on the patches in a closed system, simulating the conditions of use on the workers’ clothes. The recovery of the analytes from the media was evaluated, by spiking the patches with a known amount of each active substance and testing their performances as skin wipes. Samples were extracted and analyzed in gas chromatography with an electron capture detector. The recovery from the spiked patches was 89–96% for all pesticides, while the test recoveries were very different. Results showed a higher affinity with Imidacloprid and Hexythiazox for gauze, with Myclobutanil for cotton and with Boscalid for paper filters (W41).

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Barrese & Giovanna Tranfo & Antonella Marramao & Marialuisa Scarpelli, 2020. "Interception Systems in Assessment of Dermal Exposure to Pesticides: Laboratory Comparison of Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4389-:d:373330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4389/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4389/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4389-:d:373330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.