IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p4156-d369881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Evaluation of a Clustered Randomized Control Trial of a Comprehensive Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Primary Health Care in Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Guanyang Zou

    (School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Wei Zhang

    (Department of STDs Prevention and Control, Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510091, China)

  • Rebecca King

    (Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Zhitong Zhang

    (Division of Clinical Epidemiology &Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada)

  • John Walley

    (Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Weiwei Gong

    (Zhejiang Provincial Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Hangzhou 310052, China)

  • Min Yu

    (Zhejiang Provincial Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Hangzhou 310052, China)

  • Xiaolin Wei

    (Division of Clinical Epidemiology &Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada)

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major public health challenge in China. This study aims to understand the processes of implementing a comprehensive intervention to reduce CVD events in areas of drug therapy, lifestyle changes, and adherence support in a clustered randomized controlled trial (cRCT). This trial consisted of 67 clusters spanning over 3 years in Zhejiang Province, China. Method: A qualitative process evaluation was nested within the cRCT conducted in 9 township hospitals with 27 healthcare providers, 18 semi-structured interviews, and 23 observational studies of clinical practices within the intervention arm. Results: Effective and repeated trainings using an interactive approach were crucial to improve the prescribing behaviour of family doctors and their patient communication skills. However, the awareness of patients remained limited, thus compromising their use of CVD preventive drugs and adoption of healthy lifestyles. Health system factors further constrained providers’ and patients’ responses to the intervention. Financial barrier was a major concern because of the low coverage of health insurance. Other barriers included limited doctor–patient trust and suboptimal staff motivation. Conclusion: Our study suggests the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive CVD risk reduction strategy in China’s rural primary care facilities. However, health system barriers need to be addressed to ensure the success and sustainability of the intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanyang Zou & Wei Zhang & Rebecca King & Zhitong Zhang & John Walley & Weiwei Gong & Min Yu & Xiaolin Wei, 2020. "Process Evaluation of a Clustered Randomized Control Trial of a Comprehensive Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Primary Health Care in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4156-:d:369881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/4156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:4156-:d:369881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.