IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3461-d358743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Are Wearable Activity Trackers Adopted in Older Adults? Comparison between Subjective Adoption Attitudes and Physical Activity Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Byung Cheol Lee

    (Department of Engineering, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Junfei Xie

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Toyin Ajisafe

    (Department of Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA)

  • Sung-Hee Kim

    (Industrial ICT Engineering, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Korea)

Abstract

Wearable activity trackers can motivate older adults to engage in the recommended daily amount of physical activity (PA). However, individuals may not maintain their use of the trackers over a longer period. To investigate the attitudes of activity tracker adoption and their effects on actual PA performance, we conducted a three-month study. We gave activity trackers to 16 older adults and assessed attitudes on activity tracker adoption through a survey during the study period. We extracted participants’ PA measures, step counts, and moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) times. We observed significant differences in adoption attitudes during the three different periods ( χ 2 (2, 48) = 6.27, p < 0.05), and PA measures followed similar decreasing patterns ( F (83, 1357) = 12.56, 13.94, p < 0.00001). However, the Pearson correlation analysis ( r = 0.268, p = 0.284) and a Bland–Altman plot indicated a bias between two PA measures. Positive attitudes at the initial stage did not persist through the study period, and both step counts and length of MVPA time showed waning patterns in the study period. The longitudinal results from both measures demonstrated the patterns of old adults’ long-term use and adoption. Considering the accuracy of the activity tracker and older adults’ athletic ability, MVPA times are more likely to be a reliable measure of older adults’ long-term use and successful adoption of activity trackers than step counts. The results support the development of better activity tracker design guidelines that would facilitate long-term adoption among older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung Cheol Lee & Junfei Xie & Toyin Ajisafe & Sung-Hee Kim, 2020. "How Are Wearable Activity Trackers Adopted in Older Adults? Comparison between Subjective Adoption Attitudes and Physical Activity Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3461-:d:358743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica O’Brien & Amy Mason & Marica Cassarino & Jason Chan & Annalisa Setti, 2021. "Older Women’s Experiences of a Community-Led Walking Programme Using Activity Trackers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3461-:d:358743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.