Author
Listed:
- Pedro Forte
(Department of Sports, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal
Departamento de Desporto e Educação Física, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
Research Center for Sports Health and Human Development, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)
- Daniel A. Marinho
(Research Center for Sports Health and Human Development, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)
- Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
(School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Beat Knechtle
(Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland)
- Tiago M. Barbosa
(Departamento de Desporto e Educação Física, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
Research Center for Sports Health and Human Development, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)
- Jorge E. Morais
(Department of Sports, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, 4560-708 Penafiel, Portugal
Departamento de Desporto e Educação Física, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
Research Center for Sports Health and Human Development, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)
Abstract
Background: Resistance acting on a cyclist is a major concern among the cycling fraternity. Most of the testing methods require previous training or expensive equipment and time-consuming set-ups. By contrast, analytical procedures are more affordable and numerical simulations are perfect for manipulating and controlling inputs. The aim of this case study was to compare the drag of a cyclist in the aero position as measured using numerical simulation and analytical procedures. Methods: An elite male cyclist (65 kg in mass and 1.72 m in height) volunteered to take part in this research. The cyclist was wearing his competition gear, helmet and bicycle. A three-dimensional model of the bicycle and cyclist in the aero position was obtained to run the numerical simulations. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and a set of analytical procedures were carried out to assess drag, frontal area and drag coefficient, between 1 m/s and 22 m/s, with increments of 1 m/s. The t-test paired samples and linear regression were selected to compare, correlate and assess the methods agreement. Results: No significant differences ( t = 2.826; p = 0.275) between CFD and analytical procedures were found. The linear regression showed a very high adjustment for drag (R 2 = 0.995; p < 0.001). However, the drag values obtained by the analytical procedures seemed to be overestimated, even though without effect (d = 0.11). Conclusions: These findings suggest that drag might be assessed using both a set of analytical procedures and CFD.
Suggested Citation
Pedro Forte & Daniel A. Marinho & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Beat Knechtle & Tiago M. Barbosa & Jorge E. Morais, 2020.
"Analysis of Cyclist’s Drag on the Aero Position Using Numerical Simulations and Analytical Procedures: A Case Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-9, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3430-:d:358203
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Pedro Forte & Jorge E. Morais & Henrique P. Neiva & Tiago M. Barbosa & Daniel A. Marinho, 2020.
"The Drag Crisis Phenomenon on an Elite Road Cyclist—A Preliminary Numerical Simulations Analysis in the Aero Position at Different Speeds,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-9, July.
- Paulo Gentil & Daniel Souza & Murillo Santana & Rafael Ribeiro Alves & Mário Hebling Campos & Ronei Pinto & Martim Bottaro, 2020.
"Multi- and Single-Joint Resistance Exercises Promote Similar Plantar Flexor Activation in Resistance Trained Men,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-10, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3430-:d:358203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.