IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1111-d217809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the Evolution of Mercury (Hg) Research in the Amazon (1991–2017): A Scientometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lilian de C. Moraes Pinto

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal 73345-010, Brazil)

  • José G. Dórea

    (Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Brasília, Asa Norte, Brasília, Distrito Federal 70919-970, Brazil)

  • José Vicente Elias Bernardi

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais, Faculdade UnB Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal 73345-010, Brazil)

  • Leonardo Fernandes Gomes

    (Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas Ambientais e Limnológicas—NEPAL, Faculdade UnB de Planaltina, Planaltina, Distrito Federal 73345-010, Brazil)

Abstract

Because the Amazon rain forest is ecologically relevant on a global scale, we applied scientometric techniques to integrate studies dealing with mercury research in this unique ecosystem between 1991 and 2017. Using a combination of co-authorship and co-citation analyses, keyword mapping and overlay visualization of topics in the field, this article identified three major areas in the 26-year period of mercury research: (1) human exposure to mercury (artisanal small-scale gold mining-ASGM) and methylmercury through fish consumption, and their respective risks for human health; (2) mercury accumulation in the environment and its relation to ASGM and atmospheric concentration; and (3) mercury geochemistry and its presence in soils, sediments, and water. The paper also identified the leading institutions related to the published research and respective influential scholars in the context of this study. Overall, the analyses revealed patterns of convergence and divergence between authors, specialization, and interdisciplinary engagement in mercury investigation, thus highlighting strengths and weaknesses of research topics in the field. This scientometric approach could be a useful tool to monitor/assess the implementation of the Minamata Convention.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilian de C. Moraes Pinto & José G. Dórea & José Vicente Elias Bernardi & Leonardo Fernandes Gomes, 2019. "Mapping the Evolution of Mercury (Hg) Research in the Amazon (1991–2017): A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1111-:d:217809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leila Tahmooresnejad & Catherine Beaudry, 2018. "The importance of collaborative networks in Canadian scientific research," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 990-1029, November.
    2. Haibin Chen & Wei Jiang & Yan Yang & Xin Man & Mingyi Tang, 2015. "A bibliometric analysis of waste management research during the period 1997–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1005-1018, November.
    3. Wang, Linyuan & Zhao, Lin & Mao, Guozhu & Zuo, Jian & Du, Huibin, 2017. "Way to accomplish low carbon development transformation: A bibliometric analysis during 1995–2014," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 57-69.
    4. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.
    5. Kai Li & Jason Rollins & Erjia Yan, 2018. "Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Dennys Eduardo Rossetto & Roberto Carlos Bernardes & Felipe Mendes Borini & Cristiane Chaves Gattaz, 2018. "Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1329-1363, June.
    7. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    8. Claudia M. Vega & Jesem D.Y. Orellana & Marcos W. Oliveira & Sandra S. Hacon & Paulo C. Basta, 2018. "Human Mercury Exposure in Yanomami Indigenous Villages from the Brazilian Amazon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fábio Júnior Targino & Joanna Damazio de Nunes Ribeiro & Julia Siqueira Simões & Carla Silva Carneiro & Stella Maris Lazzarini & Aline Ramos Souza & Micheli da Silva Ferreira & Sergio Borges Mano & El, 2023. "Total Mercury Content in the Tissues of Freshwater Chelonium ( Podocnemis expansa ) and a Human Health Risk Assessment for the Amazon Population in Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez & José-Víctor Rodríguez & Niloofar Shirvanizadeh & Andrés Ortiz & Domingo-Javier Pardo-Quiles, 2021. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data and the Internet of Things to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Review Using Text Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Margarida Rodrigues & Cidália Oliveira & MárioFranco & Ana Daniel, 2024. "A Bibliometric Study About the Rural Creative Class: Proposal of a Conceptual Framework and Future Agenda," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15278-15303, September.
    4. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    5. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Carlos Mora-Frank & Lady Bravo-Montero, 2021. "Scientific Research in Ecuador: A Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, December.
    6. Seuk Wai Phoong & Seuk Yen Phoong & Shi Ling Khek, 2022. "Systematic Literature Review With Bibliometric Analysis on Markov Switching Model: Methods and Applications," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    7. Roberto Pico-Saltos & Paúl Carrión-Mero & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Javier Garzás & Andrés Redchuk, 2021. "Research Trends in Career Success: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Paúl Carrión-Mero & Nathaly Espinoza-Santos, 2021. "Cation Exchange of Natural Zeolites: Worldwide Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Dorin Vicentiu Popescu & Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Victor Marian Dumitrache, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Green Deal Policies in the Food Chain," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 410-410, April.
    10. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho, 2023. "Global Review of International Nuclear Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Weishu Liu, 2019. "The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1815-1824, December.
    12. Mengzhu Yan & Xue Wu, 2024. "Prosody in linguistic journals: a bibliometric analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Miguel Gurumendi-Noriega, 2021. "Worldwide Research on Geoparks through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    14. Néstor Montalván-Burbano & Andrés Velastegui-Montoya & Miguel Gurumendi-Noriega & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Marcos Adami, 2021. "Worldwide Research on Land Use and Land Cover in the Amazon Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    15. Kristina Galjanić & Ivan Marović & Nikša Jajac, 2022. "Decision Support Systems for Managing Construction Projects: A Scientific Evolution Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Mehmet Karakus & Muhammet Usak & Alpay Ersozlu, 2021. "Emotions in Learning, Teaching, and Leadership: A Bibliometric Review of Asian Literature (1990–2018)," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    17. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Shuib Bin Basri & P. D. D. Dominic & Luiz Fernando Capretz & Amgad Muneer & Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga Balogun & Abdul Rehman Gilal & Rao Faizan Ali, 2022. "Classifications of Sustainable Factors in Blockchain Adoption: A Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Klarin, Anton, 2019. "Mapping product and service innovation: A bibliometric analysis and a typology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Gisleine Carmo & Luiz Flávio Felizardo & Valderí Castro Alcântara & Cristiane Aparecida Silva & José Willer Prado, 2023. "The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: a scientometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1853-1875, March.
    20. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1111-:d:217809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.