IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i4p620-d207534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Accessibility: A Mobile App for Helping People with Disabilities to Search Accessible Shops

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Mayordomo-Martínez

    (Department of Structures and Construction, Technical University of Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena (Murcia), Spain)

  • Juan M. Carrillo-de-Gea

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Ginés García-Mateos

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • José A. García-Berná

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • José Luis Fernández-Alemán

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Saúl Rosero-López

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Salvador Parada-Sarabia

    (Federación de Asociaciones Murcianas de Personas con Discapacidad Física y Orgánica, 30005 Murcia, Spain)

  • Manuel García-Hernández

    (Federación de Asociaciones Murcianas de Personas con Discapacidad Física y Orgánica, 30005 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

People with motor disabilities must face many barriers and obstacles in their daily lives, making it difficult to perform everyday tasks. The purpose of this work is to improve their living conditions by providing an app with accessibility information in an updated, reliable and friendly form. The development of the system integrates national and regional accessibility regulations, architectural aspects, with an extensive field work, and a sustainable software process. The levels of accessibility and the requirements of the application are defined in the first phases of the project. The field work included the evaluation of 357 commercial establishments in the city of Murcia, Spain, showing that only 25% have a good accessibility, 40% are practicable with help, and 35% are inaccessible shops. The proposed system achieves its objectives of being sustainable and helping in the accessibility. Besides, the system can be a great incentive for businesses to improve their accessibility conditions. In conclusion, new technologies must have a much more active role in the promotion of universal accessibility. These tools must also consider the necessary requirements of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Mayordomo-Martínez & Juan M. Carrillo-de-Gea & Ginés García-Mateos & José A. García-Berná & José Luis Fernández-Alemán & Saúl Rosero-López & Salvador Parada-Sarabia & Manuel García-Hernández, 2019. "Sustainable Accessibility: A Mobile App for Helping People with Disabilities to Search Accessible Shops," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:620-:d:207534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/4/620/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/4/620/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Hengmin & Kong, Yuehan & Wei, Jing & Ma, Jing, 2018. "Effect of users’ opinion evolution on information diffusion in online social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 492(C), pages 2034-2045.
    2. Maria-Dolores Pitarch-Garrido, 2018. "Social Sustainability in Metropolitan Areas: Accessibility and Equity in the Case of the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Rodriguez-Sanchez, M.C. & Martinez-Romo, Juan, 2017. "GAWA – Manager for accessibility Wayfinding apps," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 505-519.
    4. Bertolini, L. & le Clercq, F. & Kapoen, L., 2005. "Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 207-220, May.
    5. Michael Luca & Georgios Zervas, 2016. "Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3412-3427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maëlle Corcuff & François Routhier & Stéphanie Gamache & David Fiset & Jean Leblond & Marie-Eve Lamontagne, 2022. "Implementation Determinants of Knowledge Mobilization within a Quebec Municipality to Improve Universal Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Dahlia Kairy & Mir Abolfazl Mostafavi & Catherine Blanchette-Dallaire & Eva Belanger & Andrea Corbeil & Meena Kandiah & Tian Qiang Wu & Barbara Mazer, 2021. "A Mobile App to Optimize Social Participation for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: Content Validation and Usability Testing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Diego Mayordomo-Martínez & Juan-Carlos Sánchez-Aarnoutse & Juan M. Carrillo-de-Gea & José A. García-Berná & José Luis Fernández-Alemán & Ginés García-Mateos, 2019. "Design and Development of a Mobile App for Accessible Beach Tourism Information for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Jianquan & Bertolini, Luca, 2013. "Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 100-109.
    2. Hui, Xiang & Klein, Tobias & Stahl, Konrad, 2022. "Learning from Online Ratings," CEPR Discussion Papers 17006, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    4. Gary Bolton & Kevin Breuer & Ben Greiner & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 247-256, April.
    5. Kelobonye, Keone & McCarney, Gary & Xia, Jianhong (Cecilia) & Swapan, Mohammad Shahidul Hasan & Mao, Feng & Zhou, Heng, 2019. "Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 82-93.
    6. Chaoren Lu, 2014. "The role of sustainability policy in influencing service innovation. a case study of Changzhou BRT system," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 167-168.
    7. Maria Teresa Borzacchiello & Peter Nijkamp & Eric Koomen, 2010. "Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(1), pages 148-169, February.
    8. Gala, Kaushik & Schwab, Andreas & Mueller, Brandon A., 2024. "Star entrepreneurs on digital platforms: Heavy-tailed performance distributions and their generative mechanisms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    9. Cervero, Robert, 2005. "Accessible Cities and Regions: A Framework for Sustainable Transport and Urbanism in the 21st Century," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt27g2q0cx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Ana Gil Solá & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2018. "Negotiating Proximity in Sustainable Urban Planning: A Swedish Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Dara Lee Luca & Michael Luca, 2019. "Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of the Minimum Wage on Firm Exit," NBER Working Papers 25806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.
    13. Lingfang (Ivy) Li & Steven Tadelis & Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Buying reputation as a signal of quality: Evidence from an online marketplace," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 965-988, December.
    14. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Ajay Kumar & Ram D. Gopal & Ravi Shankar & Kim Hua Tan, 2022. "Fraudulent review detection model focusing on emotional expressions and explicit aspects : investigating the potential of feature engineering," Post-Print hal-03630420, HAL.
    16. Plé, Loïc & Demangeot, Catherine, 2020. "Social contagion of online and offline deviant behaviors and its value outcomes: The case of tourism ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 886-896.
    17. Alain Bonnafous & Yves Crozet & Aurélie Mercier & Nicolas Ovtracht & Valérie Thiebaut, 2009. "MOSART (MOdélisation et Simulation de l'Accessibilité aux Réseaux et aux Territoires) : un prototype d'outil d'aide à la décision, individuelle et collective pour une mobilité durable. Rapport final," Working Papers halshs-01707182, HAL.
    18. Bastian, Bob & Zucchella, Antonella, 2023. "Nascent entrepreneurs during start-up competitions: Between beauty contests and co-created problematization," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    19. Pei-Yu Chen & Yili Hong & Ying Liu, 2018. "The Value of Multidimensional Rating Systems: Evidence from a Natural Experiment and Randomized Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4629-4647, October.
    20. Gesche, Tobias, 2018. "Reference Price Shifts and Customer Antagonism: Evidence from Reviews for Online Auctions," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181650, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:4:p:620-:d:207534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.