IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p456-d203535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility of Geriatric Syndrome Indicators for Predicting Subsequent Health Care Utilization in Older Adults in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Ju Chiu

    (Institute of Gerontology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

  • Ya-Yun Cheng

    (School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan)

Abstract

Background : The predictive utility of both individual and combined indicators of geriatric syndromes on subsequent emergency use and hospitalization is not clear. Methods : Nationally representative data on adults aged 65+ (N = 2345) (with 1148 male, 1197 female) in Taiwan were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve examined the diagnostic accuracy of the combined effects of geriatric syndromes on predicting health care utilization in three years. Negative binomial regressions identified the individual effect of each indicator with the control of sociodemographic and baseline health status. Results : The combined indicators of geriatric syndromes predicted future hospitalization of old-old (75+ yrs) diabetes patients, with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.709, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.635–0.782, and young-old patients (65–74 yrs) with mild cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.727, 95% CI = 0.610–0.845 for hospitalization and AUC = 0.770, 95% CI = 0.664–0.877 for emergency visits). As for individual indicators, while incontinence was the indicator having the most influence on hospitalization (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.21–2.72) and emergency visits (IRR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.23–2.59) for general older adults (65+), and for old-old emergency visits, especially (IRR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.39–3.49), falls was the most prominent indicator of hospitalization for young-old (65-74) adults (IRR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.13–2.28). In addition, pain was another significant indicator for predicting future hospitalization of old-old diabetes patients (IRR = 1.61, 95% CI= 1.07–2.44). Conclusions : Combined indicators of geriatric syndromes effectively predict hospitalization in old-old (75+ yrs) diabetes patients and hospitalization and emergency visits in young-old (65–74 yrs) patients with cognitive impairment. Incontinence, falls, and pain were the most predictive independent geriatric assessment indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Ju Chiu & Ya-Yun Cheng, 2019. "Utility of Geriatric Syndrome Indicators for Predicting Subsequent Health Care Utilization in Older Adults in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:456-:d:203535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/456/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/456/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:456-:d:203535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.